Journal Article
. 2003 Oct; 39(15):2187-91.
doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(03)00540-9.

Interobserver variability between general and expert pathologists during the histopathological assessment of large-core needle and open biopsies of non-palpable breast lesions

H M Verkooijen 1 J L Peterse  M E I Schipper  E Buskens  J H C L Hendriks  R M Pijnappel  P H M Peeters  I H M Borel Rinkes  W P Th M Mali  R Holland  COBRA Study Group  
  • PMID: 14522377
  •     11 citations


The purpose of this study was to assess whether general pathologists are able to make as accurate and reproducible a diagnosis on large-core needle biopsies as on open breast biopsy specimens. A total of 688 patients underwent a stereotactic large-core (14G) needle biopsy and subsequent surgical excision of 718 non-palpable breast lesions. Forty-two pathologists from 10 departments of pathology (generalists) made a diagnosis on both the needle and open biopsy specimens. Afterwards, three pathologists and two radiologists with extensive experience in breast pathology (experts) diagnosed all of the biopsy specimens. The general pathologists made a similar histological diagnosis as the experts in 632 (88%) of the needle biopsies and 649 (90%) of the open biopsy specimens. Accordingly, the interobserver agreement for the diagnosis of large-core needle biopsies between the general and experts pathologists was excellent (kappa 0.83) and not significantly different from the interobserver agreement for the diagnosis of open breast biopsies (kappa 0.86). However, many inconsistencies were observed in the category of borderline lesions: only 24% of the large-core needle biopsies and 43% of the open biopsies with an expert diagnosis of 'borderline' were diagnosed similarly by the general pathologists. Additionally, the risk of benign/malignant inconsistencies between general pathologists and experts was approximately 1 in 55 for both needle and open biopsies.

Core biopsy as a tool in planning the management of invasive breast cancer.
Amar Deshpande, Trivikram Garud, Simon D Holt.
World J Surg Oncol, 2005 Jan 06; 3(1). PMID: 15631625    Free PMC article.
Pathological diagnosis of columnar cell lesions of the breast: are there issues of reproducibility?
P H Tan, B C-S Ho, +2 authors, A Hanby.
J Clin Pathol, 2005 Jun 25; 58(7). PMID: 15976336    Free PMC article.
[Experiences of the Bavarian mammography screening program].
J Nährig, H Höfler, +4 authors, A Lebeau.
Pathologe, 2006 Jul 22; 27(5). PMID: 16858556
An overview of assessment of prognostic and predictive factors in breast cancer needle core biopsy specimens.
E A Rakha, I O Ellis.
J Clin Pathol, 2007 Jul 17; 60(12). PMID: 17630399    Free PMC article.
[Results of reference pathology in mammography screening].
H H Kreipe, H Höfler, +2 authors, D Schmidt.
Pathologe, 2008 Oct 09; 29 Suppl 2. PMID: 18841364
Diagnostic concordance in reporting breast needle core biopsies using the B classification-A panel in Italy.
Simonetta Bianchi, Saverio Caini, +3 authors, Domenico Palli.
Pathol Oncol Res, 2009 May 19; 15(4). PMID: 19449173
Can digital pathology result in cost savings? A financial projection for digital pathology implementation at a large integrated health care organization.
Jonhan Ho, Stefan M Ahlers, +6 authors, Anil V Parwani.
J Pathol Inform, 2014 Sep 25; 5(1). PMID: 25250191    Free PMC article.
Model predictions for the wide-angle x-ray scatter signals of healthy and malignant breast duct biopsies.
Robert J LeClair, Andrew Ferreira, +2 authors, Robert Y Tang.
J Med Imaging (Bellingham), 2016 Feb 03; 2(4). PMID: 26835493    Free PMC article.
Automatic prediction of tumour malignancy in breast cancer with fractal dimension.
Alan Chan, Jack A Tuszynski.
R Soc Open Sci, 2017 Jan 14; 3(12). PMID: 28083100    Free PMC article.
Open-Ended Coaxial Probe Technique for Dielectric Measurement of Biological Tissues: Challenges and Common Practices.
Alessandra La Gioia, Emily Porter, +4 authors, Martin O'Halloran.
Diagnostics (Basel), 2018 Jun 08; 8(2). PMID: 29874833    Free PMC article.
Prognostic value of histopathological DCIS features in a large-scale international interrater reliability study.
Emma J Groen, Jan Hudecek, +29 authors, Grand Challenge PRECISION consortium.
Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2020 Aug 01; 183(3). PMID: 32734520    Free PMC article.