Journal Article
. 2009 Jul; 55(1):37-45.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2009.03325.x.

Tracking with virtual slides: a tool to study diagnostic error in histopathology

Darren Treanor 1 Chee Hooi Lim  Derek Magee  Andy Bulpitt  Phil Quirke  
Affiliations
  • PMID: 19614765
  •     11 citations

Abstract

Aims: To determine the reasons for diagnostic error by virtual slides which allow unsupervised study of diagnosis and error.

Methods And Results: Software was developed to produce visualizations of the diagnostic track followed by pathologists as they viewed virtual slides. These showed the diagnostic path in four dimensions (x, y, time and zoom), areas studied for >1000 ms, and included pathologists' comments about the areas viewed. The system was used to study two trainee and two expert pathologists diagnosing 60 Barrett's oesophageal biopsy specimens. Comparisons of the diagnostic tracks showed the reason for errors. Forty-six cases had an expert consensus diagnosis. The trainees made errors in 21 and 15 cases, respectively, of which 11 and nine were clinically significant. Errors were made across the whole spectrum of diagnoses from negative to intramucosal carcinoma. Detailed examination of the tracks showed that in all errors there was incorrect interpretation of information; in three errors there was an additional failure to identify diagnostic features.

Conclusions: Tracking with virtual slides is a useful tool in studying diagnosis and error, which has the potential for use in training and assessment.

Review of the current state of whole slide imaging in pathology.
Liron Pantanowitz, Paul N Valenstein, +5 authors, Terence J Colgan.
J Pathol Inform, 2011 Sep 03; 2. PMID: 21886892    Free PMC article.
Highly Cited.
Mouse cursor movement and eye tracking data as an indicator of pathologists' attention when viewing digital whole slide images.
Vignesh Raghunath, Melissa O Braxton, +6 authors, Linda G Shapiro.
J Pathol Inform, 2013 Feb 02; 3. PMID: 23372984    Free PMC article.
Whole slide imaging for educational purposes.
Liron Pantanowitz, Janusz Szymas, Yukako Yagi, David Wilbur.
J Pathol Inform, 2013 Feb 02; 3. PMID: 23372987    Free PMC article.
Eye movements as an index of pathologist visual expertise: a pilot study.
Tad T Brunyé, Patricia A Carney, +3 authors, Joann G Elmore.
PLoS One, 2014 Aug 02; 9(8). PMID: 25084012    Free PMC article.
Expertise in clinical pathology: combining the visual and cognitive perspective.
Thomas Jaarsma, Halszka Jarodzka, +2 authors, Henny P A Boshuizen.
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract, 2015 Feb 14; 20(4). PMID: 25677013    Free PMC article.
Distance reporting in digital pathology: A study on 950 cases.
Aleksandar Vodovnik.
J Pathol Inform, 2015 May 15; 6. PMID: 25969793    Free PMC article.
Digital slide viewing for primary reporting in gastrointestinal pathology: a validation study.
Maurice B Loughrey, Paul J Kelly, +5 authors, Peter W Hamilton.
Virchows Arch, 2015 May 20; 467(2). PMID: 25982098
The importance of re-examination with deep biopsies in diagnosing cervical malignancies despite multiple negative pathology reports: A case report.
Maryam Ameri, Azadeh Memarian, Nadereh Behtash, Mojgan Karimi Zarchi.
Int J Surg Case Rep, 2015 Aug 01; 14. PMID: 26225836    Free PMC article.
Diagnostic performance on briefly presented digital pathology images.
Joseph P Houghton, Bruce R Smoller, +2 authors, Tim Dornan.
J Pathol Inform, 2015 Nov 26; 6. PMID: 26605121    Free PMC article.
Characterizing Diagnostic Search Patterns in Digital Breast Pathology: Scanners and Drillers.
Ezgi Mercan, Linda G Shapiro, +2 authors, Joann G Elmore.
J Digit Imaging, 2017 Jul 07; 31(1). PMID: 28681097    Free PMC article.
PathEdEx - Uncovering High-explanatory Visual Diagnostics Heuristics Using Digital Pathology and Multiscale Gaze Data.
Dmitriy Shin, Mikhail Kovalenko, +4 authors, Richard Hammer.
J Pathol Inform, 2017 Aug 23; 8. PMID: 28828200    Free PMC article.