Journal Article
. 2009 Sep;193(4).
doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.2483.

Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: quantitative method for kinetic curve type assessment

Riham H El Khouli 1 Katarzyna J Macura  Michael A Jacobs  Tarek H Khalil  Ihab R Kamel  Andrew Dwyer  David A Bluemke  
  • PMID: 19770298
  •     12 References
  •     50 citations


Objective: The type of contrast enhancement kinetic curve (i.e., persistently enhancing, plateau, or washout) seen on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) of the breast is predictive of malignancy. Qualitative estimates of the type of curve are most commonly used for interpretation of DCE-MRI. The purpose of this study was to compare qualitative and quantitative methods for determining the type of contrast enhancement kinetic curve on DCE-MRI.

Materials And Methods: Ninety-six patients underwent breast DCE-MRI. The type of DCE-MRI kinetic curve was assessed qualitatively by three radiologists on two occasions. For quantitative assessment, the slope of the washout curve was calculated. Kappa statistics were used to determine inter- and intraobserver agreement for the qualitative method. Matched sample tables, the McNemar test, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve statistics were used to compare quantitative versus qualitative methods for establishing or excluding malignancy.

Results: Seventy-eight lesions (77.2%) were malignant and 23 (22.8%) were benign. For the qualitative assessment, the intra- and interobserver agreement was good (kappa = 0.76-0.88), with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.73-0.77. For the quantitative method, the highest AUC was 0.87, reflecting significantly higher diagnostic accuracies compared with qualitative assessment (p < 0.01 for the difference between the two methods).

Conclusion: Quantitative assessment of the type of contrast enhancement kinetic curve on breast DCE-MRI resulted in significantly higher diagnostic performance for establishing or excluding malignancy compared with assessment based on the standard qualitative method.

Dynamic high-spatial-resolution MR imaging of suspicious breast lesions: diagnostic criteria and interobserver variability.
K Kinkel, T H Helbich, +4 authors, N M Hylton.
AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2000 Jul 06; 175(1). PMID: 10882243
A combined architectural and kinetic interpretation model for breast MR images.
M D Schnall, S Rosten, +2 authors, L W Nunes.
Acad Radiol, 2001 Jul 14; 8(7). PMID: 11450959
Detection of breast malignancy: diagnostic MR protocol for improved specificity.
Wei Huang, Paul R Fisher, +3 authors, Terry M Button.
Radiology, 2004 Jun 19; 232(2). PMID: 15205478
The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.
J R Landis, G G Koch.
Biometrics, 1977 Mar 01; 33(1). PMID: 843571
Highly Cited.
Comparing the sensitivities and specificities of two diagnostic procedures performed on the same group of patients.
N E Hawass.
Br J Radiol, 1997 Apr 01; 70(832). PMID: 9166071
Patterns of enhancement on breast MR images: interpretation and imaging pitfalls.
Katarzyna J Macura, Ronald Ouwerkerk, Michael A Jacobs, David A Bluemke.
Radiographics, 2006 Nov 15; 26(6). PMID: 17102046    Free PMC article.
Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast prior to biopsy.
David A Bluemke, Constantine A Gatsonis, +14 authors, Mitchell D Schnall.
JAMA, 2004 Dec 09; 292(22). PMID: 15585733
Highly Cited.
Variability in the description of morphologic and contrast enhancement characteristics of breast lesions on magnetic resonance imaging.
Mark J Stoutjesdijk, Jurgen J Fütterer, +3 authors, Jelle O Barentsz.
Invest Radiol, 2005 May 21; 40(6). PMID: 15905722
Dynamic bilateral contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: trade-off between spatial and temporal resolution.
Christiane K Kuhl, Hans H Schild, Nuschin Morakkabati.
Radiology, 2005 Aug 25; 236(3). PMID: 16118161
Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer.
Christiane K Kuhl, Simone Schrading, +5 authors, Hans H Schild.
J Clin Oncol, 2005 Nov 19; 23(33). PMID: 16293877
Highly Cited.
Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging: multicenter study.
Mitchell D Schnall, Jeffrey Blume, +14 authors, Constantine A Gatsonis.
Radiology, 2005 Dec 24; 238(1). PMID: 16373758
Highly Cited.
Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions?
C K Kuhl, P Mielcareck, +4 authors, H H Schild.
Radiology, 1999 Apr 06; 211(1). PMID: 10189459
Highly Cited.
Diffusion-weighted imaging improves the diagnostic accuracy of conventional 3.0-T breast MR imaging.
Riham H Ei Khouli, Michael A Jacobs, +4 authors, David A Bluemke.
Radiology, 2010 Jun 25; 256(1). PMID: 20574085    Free PMC article.
Highly Cited.
Monitoring of neoadjuvant chemotherapy using multiparametric, ²³Na sodium MR, and multimodality (PET/CT/MRI) imaging in locally advanced breast cancer.
Michael A Jacobs, Ronald Ouwerkerk, +6 authors, Vered Stearns.
Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2011 Apr 02; 128(1). PMID: 21455671    Free PMC article.
Usefulness of diffusion-weighted imaging of breast tumors: quantitative and visual assessment.
Kaiji Inoue, Eito Kozawa, +4 authors, Fumiko Kimura.
Jpn J Radiol, 2011 Jul 26; 29(6). PMID: 21786099
3-T dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: pharmacokinetic parameters versus conventional kinetic curve analysis.
Riham H El Khouli, Katarzyna J Macura, +2 authors, David A Bluemke.
AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2011 Nov 24; 197(6). PMID: 22109308    Free PMC article.
(1)H MR spectroscopy with external reference solution at 1.5 T for differentiating malignant and benign breast lesions: comparison using qualitative and quantitative approaches.
Waka Mizukoshi, Eito Kozawa, +4 authors, Fumiko Kimura.
Eur Radiol, 2012 Jul 11; 23(1). PMID: 22777619
Intra-individual randomised comparison of gadobutrol 1.0 M versus gadobenate dimeglumine 0.5 M in patients scheduled for preoperative breast MRI.
F Pediconi, R Kubik-Huch, +2 authors, K Kinkel.
Eur Radiol, 2012 Jul 17; 23(1). PMID: 22797979
Differentiation of malignant and benign breast lesions using magnetization transfer imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
Samantha L Heller, Linda Moy, +2 authors, Sungheon Kim.
J Magn Reson Imaging, 2012 Oct 26; 37(1). PMID: 23097239    Free PMC article.
A review of breast tomosynthesis. Part II. Image reconstruction, processing and analysis, and advanced applications.
Ioannis Sechopoulos.
Med Phys, 2013 Jan 10; 40(1). PMID: 23298127    Free PMC article.
Evaluation of the kinetic properties of background parenchymal enhancement throughout the phases of the menstrual cycle.
Alana R Amarosa, Jason McKellop, +6 authors, Sungheon Kim.
Radiology, 2013 May 10; 268(2). PMID: 23657893    Free PMC article.
Statistical Learning Algorithm for in situ and invasive breast carcinoma segmentation.
Jagadeesan Jayender, Eva Gombos, +3 authors, Kirby G Vosburgh.
Comput Med Imaging Graph, 2013 May 23; 37(4). PMID: 23693000    Free PMC article.
Early assessment of breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy by semi-quantitative analysis of high-temporal resolution DCE-MRI: preliminary results.
Richard G Abramson, Xia Li, +6 authors, Thomas E Yankeelov.
Magn Reson Imaging, 2013 Aug 21; 31(9). PMID: 23954320    Free PMC article.
Automatic segmentation of invasive breast carcinomas from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI using time series analysis.
Jagadaeesan Jayender, Sona Chikarmane, Ferenc A Jolesz, Eva Gombos.
J Magn Reson Imaging, 2013 Oct 12; 40(2). PMID: 24115175    Free PMC article.
Characterisation of solitary pulmonary lesions combining visual perfusion and quantitative diffusion MR imaging.
Johan Coolen, Johan Vansteenkiste, +11 authors, Johny Verschakelen.
Eur Radiol, 2013 Nov 01; 24(2). PMID: 24173597
Semi-quantitative parameter analysis of DCE-MRI revisited: monte-carlo simulation, clinical comparisons, and clinical validation of measurement errors in patients with type 2 neurofibromatosis.
Alan Jackson, Ka-Loh Li, Xiaoping Zhu.
PLoS One, 2014 Mar 07; 9(3). PMID: 24594707    Free PMC article.
Differential diagnosis between malignant and benign breast lesions using single-voxel proton MRS: a meta-analysis.
Dongzhi Cen, Li Xu.
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol, 2014 Mar 07; 140(6). PMID: 24595596
The effects of applying breast compression in dynamic contrast material-enhanced MR imaging.
Riham H El Khouli, Katarzyna J Macura, +2 authors, Michael A Jacobs.
Radiology, 2014 Mar 14; 272(1). PMID: 24620911    Free PMC article.
Breast DCE-MRI: influence of postcontrast timing on automated lesion kinetics assessments and discrimination of benign and malignant lesions.
Savannah C Partridge, Karen M Stone, +3 authors, Constance D Lehman.
Acad Radiol, 2014 Jul 08; 21(9). PMID: 24998690    Free PMC article.
3.0T MR-CAD: Clinical Value in Diagnosis of Breast Tumor Compared with Conventional MRI.
Yu-Hui Liu, Liang Xu, +6 authors, Yong Huang.
J Cancer, 2014 Jul 25; 5(7). PMID: 25057309    Free PMC article.
Multiparametric evaluation of breast lesions using PET-MRI: initial results and future perspectives.
Almir G V Bitencourt, Eduardo N P Lima, +4 authors, Marcos D Guimarães.
Medicine (Baltimore), 2014 Nov 15; 93(22). PMID: 25396329    Free PMC article.
Comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI parameters of breast lesions at 1.5 and 3.0 T: a pilot study.
F D Pineda, M Medved, +5 authors, G S Karczmar.
Br J Radiol, 2015 Mar 19; 88(1049). PMID: 25785918    Free PMC article.
Quantitative discrimination between invasive ductal carcinomas and benign lesions based on semi-automatic analysis of time intensity curves from breast dynamic contrast enhanced MRI.
Jiandong Yin, Jiawen Yang, +2 authors, Wei Zhang.
J Exp Clin Cancer Res, 2015 Apr 19; 34. PMID: 25887917    Free PMC article.
MR-Guided Near-Infrared Spectral Tomography Increases Diagnostic Performance of Breast MRI.
Michael A Mastanduno, Junqing Xu, +8 authors, Keith D Paulsen.
Clin Cancer Res, 2015 May 29; 21(17). PMID: 26019171    Free PMC article.
Identification of Breast Cancer Using Integrated Information from MRI and Mammography.
Shih-Neng Yang, Fang-Jing Li, +3 authors, Tzung-Chi Huang.
PLoS One, 2015 Jun 10; 10(6). PMID: 26056841    Free PMC article.
Ultrasound elastography and magnetic resonance examinations are effective for the accurate diagnosis of mammary duct ectasia.
Feixue Zhang, Dexin Yu, +6 authors, Guangrui Shao.
Int J Clin Exp Med, 2015 Aug 27; 8(6). PMID: 26309502    Free PMC article.
Reproducibility of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI in Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Prospective Analysis on Intra- and Interobserver and Scan-Rescan Performance of Pharmacokinetic Parameters.
Haiyi Wang, Zihua Su, +7 authors, Lin Ma.
Medicine (Baltimore), 2015 Sep 17; 94(37). PMID: 26376399    Free PMC article.
Biomarkers of evasive resistance predict disease progression in cancer patients treated with antiangiogenic therapies.
Andreas Pircher, Karin Jöhrer, +10 authors, Wolfgang Hilbe.
Oncotarget, 2016 Mar 10; 7(15). PMID: 26956051    Free PMC article.
Kinetic Curve Type Assessment for Classification of Breast Lesions Using Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging.
Shih-Neng Yang, Fang-Jing Li, +3 authors, Tzung-Chi Huang.
PLoS One, 2016 Apr 08; 11(4). PMID: 27055113    Free PMC article.
High-resolution whole-brain DCE-MRI using constrained reconstruction: Prospective clinical evaluation in brain tumor patients.
Yi Guo, R Marc Lebel, +4 authors, Krishna Nayak.
Med Phys, 2016 May 06; 43(5). PMID: 27147313    Free PMC article.
Value of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values in Differentiating Malignant and Benign Breast Lesions.
Tuğba Bozkurt Bostan, Gonca Koç, +3 authors, Orhan Oyar.
Balkan Med J, 2016 Jun 17; 33(3). PMID: 27308073    Free PMC article.
Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging in Renal Cell Carcinoma: Reproducibility of Histogram Analysis on Pharmacokinetic Parameters.
Hai-Yi Wang, Zi-Hua Su, +9 authors, Hui-Yi Ye.
Sci Rep, 2016 Jul 07; 6. PMID: 27380733    Free PMC article.
Idiopathic Granulomatous Mastitis Associated with Erythema Nodosum.
Tuğçe Özlem Kalaycı, Melike Bedel Koruyucu, +2 authors, Makbule Varer.
Balkan Med J, 2016 Jul 13; 33(2). PMID: 27403395    Free PMC article.
Breast MRI contrast enhancement kinetics of normal parenchyma correlate with presence of breast cancer.
Shandong Wu, Wendie A Berg, +5 authors, Jules H Sumkin.
Breast Cancer Res, 2016 Jul 28; 18(1). PMID: 27449059    Free PMC article.
Contribution of IVIM to Conventional Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced and Diffusion-Weighted MRI in Differentiating Benign from Malignant Breast Masses.
Qingjun Wang, Yong Guo, +3 authors, Yun Zhang.
Breast Care (Basel), 2016 Oct 11; 11(4). PMID: 27721712    Free PMC article.
Automatic Segmentation of Breast Carcinomas from DCE-MRI using a Statistical Learning Algorithm.
J Jayender, K G Vosburgh, +5 authors, K Pohl.
Proc IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging, 2012 May 01; 2012. PMID: 28603582    Free PMC article.
Percentage change of primary tumor on 18F-FDG PET/CT as a prognostic factor for invasive ductal breast cancer with axillary lymph node metastasis: Comparison with MRI.
Jang Yoo, Bom Sahn Kim, Jin Chung, Hai-Jeon Yoon.
Medicine (Baltimore), 2017 Aug 03; 96(31). PMID: 28767583    Free PMC article.
Quantitative evaluation of contrast agent uptake in standard fat-suppressed dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI examinations of the breast.
Evanthia Kousi, Joely Smith, +7 authors, Maria A Schmidt.
Med Phys, 2017 Nov 03; 45(1). PMID: 29095484    Free PMC article.
Integrated radiomic framework for breast cancer and tumor biology using advanced machine learning and multiparametric MRI.
Vishwa S Parekh, Michael A Jacobs.
NPJ Breast Cancer, 2017 Nov 21; 3. PMID: 29152563    Free PMC article.
Phantom-based study exploring the effects of different scatter correction approaches on the reconstructed images generated by contrast-enhanced stationary digital breast tomosynthesis.
Connor Puett, Christina Inscoe, +2 authors, Jianping Lu.
J Med Imaging (Bellingham), 2018 Feb 13; 5(1). PMID: 29430472    Free PMC article.
Diagnostic evaluations of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in mammary duct ectasia and breast cancer.
Lei Song, Liang Li, +5 authors, Feixue Zhang.
Oncol Lett, 2018 Feb 13; 15(2). PMID: 29434865    Free PMC article.
Discrimination between malignant and benign mass-like lesions from breast dynamic contrast enhanced MRI: semi-automatic vs. manual analysis of the signal time-intensity curves.
Jiandong Yin, Jiawen Yang, Zejun Jiang.
J Cancer, 2018 Mar 28; 9(5). PMID: 29581761    Free PMC article.
Accuracy and precision of quantitative DCE-MRI parameters: How should one estimate contrast concentration?
Nicole Wake, Hersh Chandarana, +4 authors, Sungheon Gene Kim.
Magn Reson Imaging, 2018 May 20; 52. PMID: 29777820    Free PMC article.
Discrimination of malignant and benign breast masses using automatic segmentation and features extracted from dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MRI.
Xinhua Jiang, Fei Xie, +3 authors, Li Li.
Oncol Lett, 2018 Jul 17; 16(2). PMID: 30008832    Free PMC article.
Kinetic Analysis of Lesions Identified on a Rapid Abridged Multiphase (RAMP) Breast MRI Protocol.
Sadia Choudhery, Shinn-Huey S Chou, +2 authors, Constance D Lehman.
Acad Radiol, 2019 May 31; 27(5). PMID: 31147233    Free PMC article.
Multiparametric deep learning tissue signatures for a radiological biomarker of breast cancer: Preliminary results.
Vishwa S Parekh, Katarzyna J Macura, +4 authors, Michael A Jacobs.
Med Phys, 2019 Oct 11; 47(1). PMID: 31598978    Free PMC article.
Assessing Microcirculation in Resectable Oesophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma with Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MRI for Identifying Primary tumour and Lymphatic Metastasis.
Yan-Li Chen, Yu Jiang, +6 authors, Jian-Qiong Yang.
Sci Rep, 2019 Jan 16; 9(1). PMID: 30644415    Free PMC article.
Multiparametric radiomics methods for breast cancer tissue characterization using radiological imaging.
Vishwa S Parekh, Michael A Jacobs.
Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2020 Feb 06; 180(2). PMID: 32020435    Free PMC article.
MRI-based radiomics in breast cancer: feature robustness with respect to inter-observer segmentation variability.
R W Y Granzier, N M H Verbakel, +6 authors, H C Woodruff.
Sci Rep, 2020 Aug 28; 10(1). PMID: 32843663    Free PMC article.
Application of Imaging Technologies in Breast Cancer Detection: A Review Article.
Zeinab Safarpour Lima, Mohammad Reza Ebadi, Ghazaleh Amjad, Ladan Younesi.
Open Access Maced J Med Sci, 2019 Apr 10; 7(5). PMID: 30962849    Free PMC article.
Integrated Multiparametric Radiomics and Informatics System for Characterizing Breast Tumor Characteristics with the OncotypeDX Gene Assay.
Michael A Jacobs, Christopher B Umbricht, +5 authors, Antonio C Wolff.
Cancers (Basel), 2020 Oct 01; 12(10). PMID: 32992569    Free PMC article.
Discrimination between breast invasive ductal carcinomas and benign lesions by optimizing quantitative parameters derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI using a semi-automatic method.
Jiawen Yang, Jiandong Yin.
Int J Clin Oncol, 2019 Feb 28; 24(7). PMID: 30810889