Journal Article
. 2011 Sep;7(3 Suppl).
doi: 10.1200/JOP.2011.000303.

US Insurance Program's Experience With a Multigene Assay for Early-Stage Breast Cancer

John Hornberger 1 Rebecca Chien  Katie Krebs  Louis Hochheiser  
Affiliations
  • PMID: 21886510
  •     25 References
  •     13 citations

Abstract

Purpose: National guidelines recommend a 21-gene recurrence score (RS) to aid in adjuvant treatment decision in patients with estrogen receptor (ER) -positive, lymph node (LN) -negative early-stage breast cancer (ESBC). This study was performed to assess the economic implication of the assay in community practices from the perspective of a US payer.

Methods: The study analyzed 952 women with ESBC enrolled with Humana (Louisville, KY) who were tested with the 21-gene RS between June 2006 and June 2010. The proportion of women classified by the assay according to RS risk category, use, and costs of chemotherapy regimens and supportive care, and costs of adverse events were obtained from Humana. We adopted a validated Markov model to compute the cost implications of RS for a representative patient. The probability of risk of recurrence, the chemotherapy benefit, and the decision impact of RS were derived from published studies.

Results: Two hundred fifty-five patients within the tested population received adjuvant chemotherapy. Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered to 10% of women at low risk, 36% of women at intermediate risk, and 72% of women at high risk of recurrence. On the basis of a meta-analysis in the reduction of chemotherapy after RS, the model estimated an average test saving of $1,160 per patient. The immediate direct savings for chemotherapy drugs, supportive care, and management of adverse events were $1,885, $2,578, and $472, respectively. Prevention of recurrence through appropriate treatment of patients at high risk resulted in additional savings of $199.

Conclusion: The adoption of the 21-gene RS led to targeted management of women with ER-positive, LN-negative ESBC and consequently directed savings to the payer.

Framing of outcome and probability of recurrence: breast cancer patients' choice of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) in hypothetical patient scenarios.
C Zimmermann, C Baldo, A Molino.
Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2000 Jun 14; 60(1). PMID: 10845804
Economic analysis of targeting chemotherapy using a 21-gene RT-PCR assay in lymph-node-negative, estrogen-receptor-positive, early-stage breast cancer.
John Hornberger, Leon E Cosler, Gary H Lyman.
Am J Manag Care, 2005 May 19; 11(5). PMID: 15898220
Phase III trial comparing two dose levels of epirubicin combined with cyclophosphamide with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in node-positive breast cancer.
M J Piccart, A Di Leo, +17 authors, J M Nogaret.
J Clin Oncol, 2001 Jun 16; 19(12). PMID: 11408507
Does oncotype DX recurrence score affect the management of patients with early-stage breast cancer?
Juhi Asad, Allyson F Jacobson, +7 authors, Paul I Tartter.
Am J Surg, 2008 Sep 24; 196(4). PMID: 18809056
Recommendations of the Panel on Cost-effectiveness in Health and Medicine.
M C Weinstein, J E Siegel, +2 authors, L B Russell.
JAMA, 1996 Oct 16; 276(15). PMID: 8849754
Highly Cited. Review.
Polychemotherapy for early breast cancer: an overview of the randomised clinical trials with quality-adjusted survival analysis.
B F Cole, R D Gelber, +2 authors, A Goldhirsch.
Lancet, 2001 Aug 11; 358(9278). PMID: 11498214
Review.
The influence of a gene expression profile on breast cancer decisions.
Leonard R Henry, Alexander Stojadinovic, +3 authors, Peter W Soballe.
J Surg Oncol, 2009 Feb 11; 99(6). PMID: 19204954
Prospective multicenter study of the impact of the 21-gene recurrence score assay on medical oncologist and patient adjuvant breast cancer treatment selection.
Shelly S Lo, Patricia B Mumby, +8 authors, Kathy S Albain.
J Clin Oncol, 2010 Jan 13; 28(10). PMID: 20065191
Highly Cited.
Review of guidelines for good practice in decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment.
Z Philips, L Ginnelly, +5 authors, J Glanville.
Health Technol Assess, 2004 Sep 14; 8(36). PMID: 15361314
Highly Cited. Systematic Review.
Evaluation of trends in the cost of initial cancer treatment.
Joan L Warren, K Robin Yabroff, +3 authors, Martin L Brown.
J Natl Cancer Inst, 2008 Jun 12; 100(12). PMID: 18544740    Free PMC article.
Highly Cited.
Quality of life and preferences for treatment following systemic adjuvant therapy for early-stage breast cancer.
C Lindley, S Vasa, W T Sawyer, E P Winer.
J Clin Oncol, 1998 Apr 29; 16(4). PMID: 9552041
Risk of new primary nonbreast cancers after breast cancer treatment: a Dutch population-based study.
Michael Schaapveld, Otto Visser, +6 authors, Flora E van Leeuwen.
J Clin Oncol, 2008 Mar 08; 26(8). PMID: 18323547
Survey of breast cancer patients concerning their knowledge and expectations of adjuvant therapy.
P M Ravdin, I A Siminoff, J A Harvey.
J Clin Oncol, 1998 Feb 20; 16(2). PMID: 9469335
Paclitaxel after doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide as adjuvant chemotherapy for node-positive breast cancer: results from NSABP B-28.
Eleftherios P Mamounas, John Bryant, +7 authors, Norman Wolmark.
J Clin Oncol, 2005 May 18; 23(16). PMID: 15897552
Highly Cited.
Docetaxel With Cyclophosphamide Is Associated With an Overall Survival Benefit Compared With Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide: 7-Year Follow-Up of US Oncology Research Trial 9735.
Stephen Jones, Frankie Ann Holmes, +17 authors, Michael A Savin.
J Clin Oncol, 2009 Feb 11; 27(8). PMID: 19204201
Highly Cited.
Gene expression and benefit of chemotherapy in women with node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.
Soonmyung Paik, Gong Tang, +11 authors, Norman Wolmark.
J Clin Oncol, 2006 May 25; 24(23). PMID: 16720680
Highly Cited.
Adjuvant chemotherapy in older women with early-stage breast cancer.
Hyman B Muss, Donald A Berry, +23 authors, CALGB Investigators.
N Engl J Med, 2009 May 15; 360(20). PMID: 19439741    Free PMC article.
Highly Cited.
A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer.
Soonmyung Paik, Steven Shak, +12 authors, Norman Wolmark.
N Engl J Med, 2004 Dec 14; 351(27). PMID: 15591335
Highly Cited.
Impact of a 21-gene RT-PCR assay on treatment decisions in early-stage breast cancer: an economic analysis based on prognostic and predictive validation studies.
Gary H Lyman, Leon E Cosler, Nicole M Kuderer, John Hornberger.
Cancer, 2007 Feb 22; 109(6). PMID: 17311307
Randomized trial of dose-dense versus conventionally scheduled and sequential versus concurrent combination chemotherapy as postoperative adjuvant treatment of node-positive primary breast cancer: first report of Intergroup Trial C9741/Cancer and Leukemia Group B Trial 9741.
Marc L Citron, Donald A Berry, +18 authors, Larry Norton.
J Clin Oncol, 2003 Apr 02; 21(8). PMID: 12668651
Highly Cited.
Impact of a commercial reference laboratory test recurrence score on decision making in early-stage breast cancer.
Ruth Oratz, Dev Paul, Allen L Cohn, Scot M Sedlacek.
J Oncol Pract, 2007 Jul 01; 3(4). PMID: 20859407    Free PMC article.
Patient preferences for adjuvant chemotherapy of early breast cancer: how much benefit is needed?
R J Simes, A S Coates.
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr, 2002 Jan 05; (30). PMID: 11773309
Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials.
Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG).
Lancet, 2005 May 17; 365(9472). PMID: 15894097
Highly Cited.
Principles of good practice for decision analytic modeling in health-care evaluation: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Good Research Practices--Modeling Studies.
Milton C Weinstein, Bernie O'Brien, +5 authors, ISPOR Task Force on Good Research Practices--Modeling Studies.
Value Health, 2003 Jan 22; 6(1). PMID: 12535234
Highly Cited.
Economic implications of 21-gene breast cancer risk assay from the perspective of an Israeli-managed health-care organization.
Shmuel H Klang, Ariel Hammerman, +3 authors, John Hornberger.
Value Health, 2010 Apr 24; 13(4). PMID: 20412544
Evaluating use characteristics for the oncotype dx 21-gene recurrence score and concordance with chemotherapy use in early-stage breast cancer.
Clara Chen, Rahul Dhanda, +2 authors, Debra A Patt.
J Oncol Pract, 2013 Aug 15; 9(4). PMID: 23942918    Free PMC article.
The impact of the Oncotype Dx breast cancer assay in clinical practice: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Josh J Carlson, Joshua A Roth.
Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2013 Aug 27; 141(1). PMID: 23974828    Free PMC article.
Highly Cited. Systematic Review.
Multigene Assays for Classification, Prognosis, and Prediction in Breast Cancer: a Critical Review on the Background and Clinical Utility.
P Sinn, S Aulmann, +6 authors, A Schneeweiss.
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd, 2014 Apr 29; 73(9). PMID: 24771945    Free PMC article.
Predictive and prognostic value of the 21-gene recurrence score in hormone receptor-positive, node-positive breast cancer.
Adam M Brufsky.
Am J Clin Oncol, 2014 May 24; 37(4). PMID: 24853663    Free PMC article.
Systematic Review.
Clinical utility of gene-expression profiling in women with early breast cancer: an overview of systematic reviews.
Michael Marrone, Alison Stewart, W David Dotson.
Genet Med, 2014 Dec 05; 17(7). PMID: 25474343    Free PMC article.
Review.
Assessing cost-utility of predictive biomarkers in oncology: a streamlined approach.
Anton Safonov, Shiyi Wang, +4 authors, Christos Hatzis.
Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2016 Jan 11; 155(2). PMID: 26749360    Free PMC article.
21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay As a Predictor of Adjuvant Chemotherapy Administration for Early-Stage Breast Cancer: An Analysis of Use, Therapeutic Implications, and Disparity Profile.
Jagar Jasem, Arya Amini, +4 authors, Peter Kabos.
J Clin Oncol, 2016 Mar 24; 34(17). PMID: 27001563    Free PMC article.
Breast cancer multigene testing trends and impact on chemotherapy use.
G Thomas Ray, Jeanne Mandelblatt, +4 authors, Tracy A Lieu.
Am J Manag Care, 2016 Jun 09; 22(5). PMID: 27266581    Free PMC article.
Towards decision-making using individualized risk estimates for personalized medicine: A systematic review of genomic classifiers of solid tumors.
Daniel M Trifiletti, Vanessa N Sturz, Timothy N Showalter, Jennifer M Lobo.
PLoS One, 2017 May 10; 12(5). PMID: 28486497    Free PMC article.
Systematic Review.
Cost-Effectiveness Analyses of the 21-Gene Assay in Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal.
Shi-Yi Wang, Weixiong Dang, +3 authors, Cary P Gross.
J Clin Oncol, 2018 Apr 17; 36(16). PMID: 29659329    Free PMC article.
Systematic Review.
Practice patterns and outcomes for patients with node-negative hormone receptor-positive breast cancer and intermediate 21-gene Recurrence Scores.
Jonathan Chen, Xian Wu, +2 authors, Himanshu Nagar.
Breast Cancer Res, 2018 Apr 18; 20(1). PMID: 29661221    Free PMC article.
Demand for Precision Medicine: A Discrete-Choice Experiment and External Validation Study.
Dean A Regier, David L Veenstra, Anirban Basu, Josh J Carlson.
Pharmacoeconomics, 2019 Sep 07; 38(1). PMID: 31489595
Overview of Breast Cancer and Implications of Overtreatment of Early-Stage Breast Cancer: An Indian Perspective.
Gouri Shankar Bhattacharyya, Dinesh C Doval, +3 authors, S P Somashekhar.
JCO Glob Oncol, 2020 Jun 09; 6. PMID: 32511068    Free PMC article.