Journal Article
. 2013 Jul;12(3).
doi: 10.2463/mrms.2012-0095.

Correlations between apparent diffusion coefficient values and prognostic factors of breast cancer

Takeshi Kamitani 1 Yoshio Matsuo  Hidetake Yabuuchi  Nobuhiro Fujita  Michinobu Nagao  Mikako Jinnouchi  Masato Yonezawa  Yuzo Yamasaki  Eriko Tokunaga  Makoto Kubo  Hidetaka Yamamoto  Takashi Yoshiura  Hiroshi Honda  
Affiliations
  • PMID: 23857151
  •     25 citations

Abstract

Purpose: We investigated possible correlations between apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and prognostic factors of breast cancer.

Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 81 patients who underwent magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the breast and were diagnosed pathologically with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) not otherwise specified with invasive foci one cm or larger. We excluded ductal carcinoma in situ and IDC with invasive foci smaller than one cm because small lesions decrease the reliability of signal intensity of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). We also excluded special type cancers. We used t-test to compare the mean ADC values of cancers of Stage pT1 (≤2 cm) versus pT2 or 3 (>2 cm), cancers with versus without vascular invasion, axillary lymph node (N)-positive versus N-negative cancers, estrogen receptor (ER)-positive versus ER-negative cancers, and progesterone receptor (PgR)-positive versus PgR-negative cancers. We analyzed correlations between the ADC value with nuclear grade (NG) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) score by rank test using Spearman's correlation coefficient.

Results: The mean ADC value was significantly higher for N-positive (n=28; 0.97 ± 0.20 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s) than N-negative cancers (n=53; 0.87 ± 0.17 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s) (P=0.017); significantly lower for ER-positive (n=63; 0.88 ± 0.15 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s) than ER-negative cancers (n=18; 1.01 ± 0.21 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s) (P=0.005); and significantly lower for PgR-positive (n=47; 0.88 ± 0.16 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s) than PgR-negative cancers (n=34; 0.95 ± 0.18 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s) (P=0.048). Tumor size, vascular invasion, NG, and HER2 status showed no significant correlation with ADC values.

Conclusion: ADC values were higher for N-positive and ER-negative breast cancers than N-negative and ER-positive cancers.

Intratumoral heterogeneity of breast cancer xenograft models: texture analysis of diffusion-weighted MR imaging.
Bo La Yun, Nariya Cho, +6 authors, Woo Kyung Moon.
Korean J Radiol, 2014 Sep 24; 15(5). PMID: 25246820    Free PMC article.
MR mammography using diffusion-weighted imaging in evaluating breast cancer: a correlation with proliferation index.
Cristina Molinari, Paola Clauser, +5 authors, Massimo Bazzocchi.
Radiol Med, 2015 Mar 18; 120(10). PMID: 25776017
Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in 3.0 Tesla Breast MRI: Diagnostic Performance and Tumor Characterization Using Small Subregions vs. Whole Tumor Regions of Interest.
Otso Arponen, Otso Arponent, +9 authors, Ritva Vanninen.
PLoS One, 2015 Oct 13; 10(10). PMID: 26458106    Free PMC article.
Diagnostic performance of ADCs in different ROIs for breast lesions.
Wei Zhang, Guan-Qiao Jin, +6 authors, Wei-Li Huang.
Int J Clin Exp Med, 2015 Nov 10; 8(8). PMID: 26550121    Free PMC article.
Evaluation of breast cancer using intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) histogram analysis: comparison with malignant status, histological subtype, and molecular prognostic factors.
Gene Young Cho, Linda Moy, +5 authors, Eric E Sigmund.
Eur Radiol, 2015 Nov 30; 26(8). PMID: 26615557    Free PMC article.
Apparent diffusion coefficient value in invasive ductal carcinoma at 3.0 Tesla: is it correlated with prognostic factors?
Inanc Guvenc, Sinan Akay, +4 authors, Mustafa Tasar.
Br J Radiol, 2016 Feb 09; 89(1060). PMID: 26853508    Free PMC article.
Diffusion Weighted MR Imaging of Breast and Correlation of Prognostic Factors in Breast Cancer.
İnci Kızıldağ Yırgın, Gözde Arslan, +5 authors, Eyüp Kaya.
Balkan Med J, 2016 Jun 17; 33(3). PMID: 27308074    Free PMC article.
Metabolomics of Breast Cancer Using High-Resolution Magic Angle Spinning Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy: Correlations with 18F-FDG Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography, Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced and Diffusion-Weighted Imaging MRI.
Haesung Yoon, Dahye Yoon, +9 authors, Min Jung Kim.
PLoS One, 2016 Jul 28; 11(7). PMID: 27459480    Free PMC article.
Quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient measurement obtained by 3.0Tesla MRI as a potential noninvasive marker of tumor aggressiveness in breast cancer.
Manuela Durando, Lucas Gennaro, +7 authors, Sunitha B Thakur.
Eur J Radiol, 2016 Aug 10; 85(9). PMID: 27501902    Free PMC article.
Diffusion-weighted imaging of breast lesions: Region-of-interest placement and different ADC parameters influence apparent diffusion coefficient values.
Hubert Bickel, Katja Pinker, +7 authors, Pascal Baltzer.
Eur Radiol, 2016 Sep 01; 27(5). PMID: 27578047
Diffusion-weighted breast MRI: Clinical applications and emerging techniques.
Savannah C Partridge, Noam Nissan, +2 authors, Eric E Sigmund.
J Magn Reson Imaging, 2016 Oct 01; 45(2). PMID: 27690173    Free PMC article.
Highly Cited. Review.
Voxelwise analysis of simultaneously acquired and spatially correlated 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET and intravoxel incoherent motion metrics in breast cancer.
Jason Ostenson, Akshat C Pujara, +13 authors, Eric E Sigmund.
Magn Reson Med, 2016 Oct 26; 78(3). PMID: 27779790    Free PMC article.
Diagnostic Performance of Diffusion Tensor Imaging with Readout-segmented Echo-planar Imaging for Invasive Breast Cancer: Correlation of ADC and FA with Pathological Prognostic Markers.
Ken Yamaguchi, Takahiko Nakazono, +4 authors, Hiroyuki Irie.
Magn Reson Med Sci, 2016 Nov 18; 16(3). PMID: 27853053    Free PMC article.
Diagnostic Value of Diffusion-weighted Imaging and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values in the Differentiation of Breast Lesions, Histpathologic Subgroups and Correlatıon with Prognostıc Factors using 3.0 Tesla MR.
Yasin Akın, M Ümit Uğurlu, Handan Kaya, Erkin Arıbal.
J Breast Health, 2016 Jan 01; 12(3). PMID: 28331748    Free PMC article.
Apparent diffusion coefficient in estrogen receptor-positive and lymph node-negative invasive breast cancers at 3.0T DW-MRI: A potential predictor for an oncotype Dx test recurrence score.
Sunitha B Thakur, Manuela Durando, +5 authors, Elizabeth A Morris.
J Magn Reson Imaging, 2017 Jun 24; 47(2). PMID: 28640531    Free PMC article.
DWI in the Assessment of Breast Lesions.
Savannah C Partridge, Nita Amornsiripanitch.
Top Magn Reson Imaging, 2017 Sep 30; 26(5). PMID: 28961569    Free PMC article.
Is there any relationship between adc values of diffusion-weighted imaging and the histopathological prognostic factors of invasive ductal carcinoma?
Hale Aydin, Bahar Guner, +4 authors, Mehmet Ali Gulcelik.
Br J Radiol, 2018 Jan 05; 91(1084). PMID: 29299933    Free PMC article.
The diagnostic role of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in hypopharyngeal carcinoma.
Si-Cong Zhang, Shui-Hong Zhou, +3 authors, Ting-Ting Wu.
Oncol Lett, 2018 Mar 20; 15(4). PMID: 29552192    Free PMC article.
Intravoxel incoherent motion magnetic resonance imaging for breast cancer: A comparison with benign lesions and evaluation of heterogeneity in different tumor regions with prognostic factors and molecular classification.
Ming Zhao, Kuang Fu, +6 authors, Jiawei Tian.
Oncol Lett, 2018 Sep 27; 16(4). PMID: 30250578    Free PMC article.
Correlation between apparent diffusion coefficient values in breast magnetic resonance imaging and prognostic factors of breast invasive ductal carcinoma.
Ricardo Moutinho-Guilherme, Janeth Hercilia Oyola, +4 authors, Vicente Martínez de Vega.
Porto Biomed J, 2018 Aug 03; 4(1). PMID: 31595254    Free PMC article.
Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of Breast Cancer: Correlation of the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value with Pathologic Prognostic Factors.
Şehnaz Tezcan, Nihal Uslu, +2 authors, Tugan Tezcaner.
Eur J Breast Health, 2019 Oct 18; 15(4). PMID: 31620686    Free PMC article.
[Correlations between apparent diffusion coefficient in diffusion?weighted magnetic resonance imaging and molecular subtypes of invasive breast cancer masses].
Liu-Tong Shang, Jia-Fei Yang, +6 authors, Ming-Yan Hu.
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao, 2017 Oct 27; 37(10). PMID: 29070476    Free PMC article.
Diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) as a non-invasive, tissue cellularity marker to monitor cancer treatment response.
Frederikke Petrine Fliedner, Trine Bjørnbo Engel, +2 authors, Andreas Kjaer.
BMC Cancer, 2020 Feb 23; 20(1). PMID: 32075610    Free PMC article.
Differentiation of Breast Lesions and Distinguishing Their Histological Subtypes Using Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and ADC Values.
Jelena Maric, Jasmina Boban, +3 authors, Dragana Bogdanovic-Stojanovic.
Front Oncol, 2020 Apr 02; 10. PMID: 32232007    Free PMC article.
Two Different Methods of Region-of-Interest Placement for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions by Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value
Masoumeh Gity, Behnaz Moradi, +2 authors, Mohamad Ali Kazemi.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 2018 Oct 27; 19(10). PMID: 30360604    Free PMC article.