Journal Article
. 2015 Nov; 8(8):12096-104.

Diagnostic performance of ADCs in different ROIs for breast lesions

Wei Zhang 1 Guan-Qiao Jin 1 Jun-Jie Liu 2 Dan-Ke Su 1 Ning-Bin Luo 1 Dong Xie 1 Shao-Lv Lai 1 Xiang-Yang Huang 1 Wei-Li Huang 1 
Affiliations
  • PMID: 26550121
  •     29 References
  •     6 citations

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to explore the diagnostic performance of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values for breast lesions by different measuring methods and find out the optimum measuring method.

Methods: ADCW-mean and ADCW-min were obtained by whole-measurement method, while ADCmean and ADCmin were extracted by spot-measurement method. Four ADCs were analyzed by One-way ANOVA and Independent T-test. The diagnostic performances of these four ADCs were calculated by receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves and the area under the curves (AUC) were compared through Z-test.

Results: For the whole-measurement method, there were significant differences between malignant and benign lesions (ADCW-mean=1.014±0.197 for malignant, ADCW-mean=1.650±0.348 for benign, F=37.511, P<0.001; ADCW-min=0.627±0.144 for malignant, ADCW-min=1.245±0.290 for benign, F=41.446, P<0.001), as well as the spot-measurement method (ADCmean=1.010±0.234 for malignant, ADCmean=1.648±0.392 for benign, F=34.580, P<0.001; ADCmin=0.817±0.203 for malignant, ADCmin=1.411±0.357 for benign, F=40.039, P<0.001). The optimal diagnostic threshold of ADCW-mean, ADCW-min, ADCmean, and ADCmin values were 1.223×10(-3) mm(2)/s, 0.897×10(-3) mm(2)/s, 1.315×10(-3) mm(2)/s, and 1.111×10(-3) mm(2)/s, respectively. ROC curves indicated that the AUC for ADCW-min (0.969) was statistically significant higher than the AUC for ADCW-mean (0.940; Z=2.473, p=0.013), ADCmean (0.919; Z=3.691, P=0.000), and ADCmin (0.928; Z=3.634, P=0.000). The AUC for ADCW-mean was also significantly higher than the AUC for ADCmean (Z=2.863, P=0.004).

Conclusion: The results provided evidence that the most reliable and accurate value in demonstrating the limitation of diffusion may be ADCW-min, and it has the highest diagnostic value in distinguishing breast lesions from malignant to benign.

Keywords: Diagnostic performance; apparent diffusion coefficient; breast lesions.

Other Links

Free PMC article 
Apparent diffusion coefficient ratio between axillary lymph node with primary tumor to detect nodal metastasis in breast cancer patients.
Ningbin Luo, Danke Su, +4 authors, Younan Liu.
J Magn Reson Imaging, 2013 Feb 27; 38(4). PMID: 23440958
Diffusion-weighted imaging of breast cancer: correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficient value with prognostic factors.
Sung Hun Kim, Eun Suk Cha, +5 authors, Young Jin Suh.
J Magn Reson Imaging, 2009 Aug 28; 30(3). PMID: 19711411
Quantitative diffusion imaging in breast cancer: a clinical prospective study.
Erika Rubesova, Anne-Sophie Grell, +3 authors, Marc Lemort.
J Magn Reson Imaging, 2006 Jun 21; 24(2). PMID: 16786565
Apparent diffusion coefficient values for discriminating benign and malignant breast MRI lesions: effects of lesion type and size.
Savannah C Partridge, Christiane D Mullins, +4 authors, Constance D Lehman.
AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2010 May 22; 194(6). PMID: 20489111
Contribution of diffusion-weighted imaging to dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the characterization of breast tumors.
Sibel Kul, Aysegul Cansu, +3 authors, Abdulkadir Reis.
AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2010 Dec 24; 196(1). PMID: 21178069
Assessment of breast lesions with diffusion-weighted MRI: comparing the use of different b values.
Fernanda Philadelpho Arantes Pereira, Gabriela Martins, +4 authors, Emerson Leandro Gasparetto.
AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2009 Sep 23; 193(4). PMID: 19770326
Diffusion-weighted imaging improves the diagnostic accuracy of conventional 3.0-T breast MR imaging.
Riham H Ei Khouli, Michael A Jacobs, +4 authors, David A Bluemke.
Radiology, 2010 Jun 25; 256(1). PMID: 20574085    Free PMC article.
Highly Cited.
Relation between cancer cellularity and apparent diffusion coefficient values using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer.
Miho I Yoshikawa, Shozo Ohsumi, +5 authors, Yutaka Imai.
Radiat Med, 2008 May 30; 26(4). PMID: 18509722
Apparent diffusion coefficient as an MR imaging biomarker of low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ: a pilot study.
Mami Iima, Denis Le Bihan, +7 authors, Kaori Togashi.
Radiology, 2011 Jun 03; 260(2). PMID: 21633054
Differentiation of clinically benign and malignant breast lesions using diffusion-weighted imaging.
Yong Guo, You-Quan Cai, +5 authors, Jia-Hong Gao.
J Magn Reson Imaging, 2002 Aug 31; 16(2). PMID: 12203765
Highly Cited.
Differentiation between benign and malignant breast lesions using quantitative diffusion-weighted sequence on 3 T MRI.
S L L Tan, K Rahmat, +5 authors, K H Ng.
Clin Radiol, 2013 Oct 26; 69(1). PMID: 24156797
Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: value of diffusion-weighted MR imaging for nodal staging.
Vincent Vandecaveye, Frederik De Keyzer, +4 authors, Robert Hermans.
Radiology, 2009 Mar 03; 251(1). PMID: 19251938
Tumour ADC measurements in rectal cancer: effect of ROI methods on ADC values and interobserver variability.
Doenja M J Lambregts, Geerard L Beets, +4 authors, Regina G H Beets-Tan.
Eur Radiol, 2011 Aug 09; 21(12). PMID: 21822946    Free PMC article.
Correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficiency values on diffusion-weighted imaging with prognostic factors for breast cancer.
S Y Choi, Y-W Chang, +3 authors, D Y Seo.
Br J Radiol, 2011 Dec 01; 85(1016). PMID: 22128125    Free PMC article.
ADC mapping of benign and malignant breast tumors.
Reiko Woodhams, Keiji Matsunaga, +6 authors, Kazushige Hayakawa.
Magn Reson Med Sci, 2005 Aug 30; 4(1). PMID: 16127252
Enhanced mass on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: Lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images.
Hidetake Yabuuchi, Yoshio Matsuo, +9 authors, Hiroshi Honda.
J Magn Reson Imaging, 2008 Oct 31; 28(5). PMID: 18972357
Investigation of statistical iterative reconstruction for dedicated breast CT.
Andrey Makeev, Stephen J Glick.
Med Phys, 2013 Aug 10; 40(8). PMID: 23927318    Free PMC article.
Bisphosphonate-functionalized gold nanoparticles for contrast-enhanced X-ray detection of breast microcalcifications.
Lisa E Cole, Tracy Vargo-Gogola, Ryan K Roeder.
Biomaterials, 2013 Dec 24; 35(7). PMID: 24360718    Free PMC article.
Diffusion-weighted imaging of breast masses: comparison of diagnostic performance using various apparent diffusion coefficient parameters.
Maki Hirano, Hiroko Satake, +3 authors, Shinji Naganawa.
AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2012 Feb 24; 198(3). PMID: 22358015
Predictive value for malignancy of suspicious breast masses of BI-RADS categories 4 and 5 using ultrasound elastography and MR diffusion-weighted imaging.
Hiroko Satake, Akiko Nishio, +4 authors, Shinji Naganawa.
AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2010 Dec 24; 196(1). PMID: 21178068
Diffusion-weighted imaging of mucinous carcinoma of the breast: evaluation of apparent diffusion coefficient and signal intensity in correlation with histologic findings.
Reiko Woodhams, Satoko Kakita, +4 authors, Hiroto Hatabu.
AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2009 Jun 23; 193(1). PMID: 19542422
Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of upper abdominal organs: field strength and intervendor variability of apparent diffusion coefficients.
Olivio F Donati, Daniel Chong, +5 authors, Harriet C Thoeny.
Radiology, 2014 Jan 30; 270(2). PMID: 24471390
The role of diffusion-weighted imaging and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values for breast tumors.
Mi Jung Park, Eun Suk Cha, +2 authors, Jun Hyun Baik.
Korean J Radiol, 2007 Oct 10; 8(5). PMID: 17923781    Free PMC article.
Diffusion-weighted imaging of breast cancer with the sensitivity encoding technique: analysis of the apparent diffusion coefficient value.
Yoshifumi Kuroki, Katsuhiro Nasu, +4 authors, Shigeru Nawano.
Magn Reson Med Sci, 2005 Aug 12; 3(2). PMID: 16093623
Diffusion-weighted imaging of malignant breast tumors: the usefulness of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value and ADC map for the detection of malignant breast tumors and evaluation of cancer extension.
Reiko Woodhams, Keiji Matsunaga, +5 authors, Kazushige Hayakawa.
J Comput Assist Tomogr, 2005 Sep 16; 29(5). PMID: 16163035
Correlations between apparent diffusion coefficient values and prognostic factors of breast cancer.
Takeshi Kamitani, Yoshio Matsuo, +10 authors, Hiroshi Honda.
Magn Reson Med Sci, 2013 Jul 17; 12(3). PMID: 23857151
Isolated clustered microcalcifications: diagnostic value of mammography--series of 400 cases with surgical verification.
B de Lafontan, J P Daures, +6 authors, H Pujol.
Radiology, 1994 Feb 01; 190(2). PMID: 8284403
Role of diffusion-weighted imaging as an adjunct to contrast-enhanced breast MRI in evaluating residual breast cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Soo Yeon Hahn, Eun Young Ko, +2 authors, Eun Sook Ko.
Eur J Radiol, 2013 Dec 10; 83(2). PMID: 24315957
Quantitative diffusion weighted imaging for differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions: the influence of the choice of b-values.
Nicky H G M Peters, Koen L Vincken, +3 authors, Lambertus W Bartels.
J Magn Reson Imaging, 2010 May 01; 31(5). PMID: 20432344
Identification of endothelial selectin as a potential prognostic marker in breast cancer.
Wei Zhang, Zhichao Zuo, +3 authors, Danke Su.
Oncol Lett, 2018 Jun 22; 15(6). PMID: 29928363    Free PMC article.
Diagnostic performance of breast tumor tissue selection in diffusion weighted imaging: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
M Wielema, M D Dorrius, +4 authors, P E Sijens.
PLoS One, 2020 May 07; 15(5). PMID: 32374781    Free PMC article.
Systematic Review.
The apparent diffusion coefficient is a useful biomarker in predicting treatment response in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.
Mayra Evelia Jiménez de Los Santos, Juan Armando Reyes-Pérez, +4 authors, Isabel Sollozo-Dupont.
Acta Radiol Open, 2020 Sep 26; 9(9). PMID: 32974055    Free PMC article.
[Diffusion-weighted imaging-diagnostic supplement or alternative to contrast agents in early detection of malignancies?]
S Bickelhaupt, C Dreher, +4 authors, T A Kuder.
Radiologe, 2019 May 09; 59(6). PMID: 31065738
Review.
Diffusion weighted imaging of the breast: Performance of standardized breast tumor tissue selection methods in clinical decision making.
M Wielema, P E Sijens, +7 authors, M Oudkerk.
PLoS One, 2021 Jan 26; 16(1). PMID: 33493230    Free PMC article.
Apparent diffusion coefficient values in borderline breast lesions upgraded and not upgraded at definitive histopathological examination after surgical excision.
Corrado Tagliati, Paola Piccinni, +4 authors, Andrea Giovagnoni.
Pol J Radiol, 2021 Jun 08; 86. PMID: 34093923    Free PMC article.