Journal Article
. 2016 Jan; 32(5):835-9.
doi: 10.1185/03007995.2016.1146664.

Value of a gene signature assay in patients with early breast cancer and intermediate risk: a single institution retrospective study

Jacques Bonneterre 1 Aleix Prat 2 Patricia Galván 2 Pascale Morel 3 Sylvia Giard 1 
Affiliations
  • PMID: 26809116
  •     3 citations

Abstract

Purpose In daily clinical practice, the indication for adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) is relatively easy to make in patients with early hormone-receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer with either very poor or very good clinicopathological prognostic variables. However, this decision is much more difficult in patients with intermediate clinicopathological prognostic variables. Here, we evaluate the value of a gene-expression profile identified by the Prosigna gene signature assay in guiding treatment decision-making in patients with these intermediate features. Methods A consecutive cohort of 577 HR + breast cancer patients surgically treated in a single institution between January 2012 and December 2012 was evaluated. From this population, pre- and post-menopausal patients with intermediate prognosis clinicopathological variables were identified and indication of adjuvant CT in these patients was recorded. The gene signature assay was performed retrospectively in this intermediate risk group. Descriptive statistics are presented. Results Among 96 intermediate-risk patients, 64 postmenopausal patients underwent gene signature testing. Subtype distribution was as follows: Luminal A (N = 33; 51.6%), Luminal B (N = 31; 48.4%). Risk of recurrence (ROR) distribution was as follows: ROR-low (n = 16; 25%); ROR-intermediate (N = 26; 40.6%); and ROR-high (N = 22; 34.4%). CT was subsequently administered in 18.7%, 53.8% and 59.0% of the ROR-low, ROR-intermediate and ROR-high groups, respectively. With the use of the gene signature assay, 59.4% of the intermediate cases were re-classified to either ROR-low or ROR-high risk categories. In the ROR-intermediate group, 11/26 patients (42.3%) had Luminal A and 15/26 (57.7%) had Luminal B. Due to follow-up time constraints, no patient outcome results were evaluated. Conclusion The gene signature assay provides clinically useful information and improved treatment decision-making in patients with intermediate risk based on clinicopathological factors. Determining the patient's intrinsic subtype and ROR can aid clinicians in deciding whether CT should be indicated.

Keywords: Adjuvant; Breast cancer; Genomic; Intrinsic subtypes; PAM50.

CDH22 hypermethylation is an independent prognostic biomarker in breast cancer.
Esperanza Martín-Sánchez, Saioa Mendaza, +7 authors, David Guerrero-Setas.
Clin Epigenetics, 2017 Feb 06; 9. PMID: 28149335    Free PMC article.
Prognostic value of PAM50 and risk of recurrence score in patients with early-stage breast cancer with long-term follow-up.
Hege O Ohnstad, Elin Borgen, +11 authors, Bjørn Naume.
Breast Cancer Res, 2017 Nov 16; 19(1). PMID: 29137653    Free PMC article.
Should a Multigene Signature be Used in all Luminal Early Breast Cancers.
Nawale Hajjaji, Yves Marie Robin, Jacques Bonneterre.
Front Oncol, 2019 Jun 20; 9. PMID: 31214499    Free PMC article.