Journal Article
. 2016 Jun; 33(3):294-300.
doi: 10.5152/balkanmedj.2016.141007.

Value of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values in Differentiating Malignant and Benign Breast Lesions

Tuğba Bozkurt Bostan 1 Gonca Koç 1 Gülten Sezgin 1 Canan Altay 1 M Fazıl Gelal 1 Orhan Oyar 1 
Affiliations
  • PMID: 27308073
  •     37 References
  •     3 citations

Abstract

Background: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become a diagnostic and problem solving method for the breast examinations in addition to conventional breast examination methods. Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) adds valuable information to conventional MRI.

Aims: Our aim was to show the impact of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values acquired with DWI to differentiate benign and malignant breast lesions.

Study Design: Diagnostic accuracy study.

Methods: Forty-six women with 58 breast masses (35 malignant, 23 benign) were examined on a 1.5 T clinical MRI scanner. The morphologic characteristics of the lesions on conventional MRI sequences and contrast uptake pattern were assessed. ADC values of both lesions and normal breast parenchyma were measured. The ADC values obtained were statistically compared with the histopathologic results using Paired Samples t-Test.

Results: Multiple lesions were detected in 12 (26%) of the patients, while only one lesion was detected in 34 (74%). Overall, 35 lesions out of 58 were histopathologically proven to be malignant. In the dynamic contrast-enhanced series, 5 of the malignant lesions were type 1, while 8 benign lesions revealed either type 2 or 3 time signal intensity curves (85% sensitivity, 56% spesifity). Mean ADC values were significantly different in malignant vs. benign lesions. (1.04±0.29×10(-3) cm(2)/sec vs. 1.61±0.50×10(-3) cm(2)/sec for the malignant and benign lesions, respectively, p=0.03). A cut-off value of 1.30×10(-3) mm(2)/sec for ADC detected with receiver operating characteristic analysis yielded 89.1% sensitivity and 100% specificity for the differentiation between benign and malignant lesions.

Conclusion: ADC values improve the diagnostic accuracy of solid breast lesions when evaluated with the conventional MRI sequences. Therefore, DWI should be incorporated to routine breast MRI protocol.

Keywords: Apparent diffusion coefficient value; breast magnetic resonance imaging; diffusion-weighted imaging.

BRCA1 mutations and breast cancer in the general population: analyses in women before age 35 years and in women before age 45 years with first-degree family history.
K E Malone, J R Daling, +3 authors, E A Ostrander.
JAMA, 1998 Apr 17; 279(12). PMID: 9544766
Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions?
C K Kuhl, P Mielcareck, +4 authors, H H Schild.
Radiology, 1999 Apr 06; 211(1). PMID: 10189459
Highly Cited.
Basic principles of diffusion-weighted imaging.
Roland Bammer.
Eur J Radiol, 2003 Feb 22; 45(3). PMID: 12595101
Highly Cited. Review.
Patterns of enhancement on breast MR images: interpretation and imaging pitfalls.
Katarzyna J Macura, Ronald Ouwerkerk, Michael A Jacobs, David A Bluemke.
Radiographics, 2006 Nov 15; 26(6). PMID: 17102046    Free PMC article.
Review.
Quantitative diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the differential diagnosis of breast lesion.
C Marini, C Iacconi, +3 authors, C Bartolozzi.
Eur Radiol, 2007 Mar 16; 17(10). PMID: 17356840
Detecting breast cancer with non-contrast MR imaging: combining diffusion-weighted and STIR imaging.
Seiko Kuroki-Suzuki, Yoshifumi Kuroki, +3 authors, Masatoshi Okazaki.
Magn Reson Med Sci, 2007 May 19; 6(1). PMID: 17510539
How to perform diffusion-weighted imaging.
G M Bydder, M A Rutherford, J V Hajnal.
Childs Nerv Syst, 2001 Jun 12; 17(4-5). PMID: 11398937
Quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging as an adjunct to conventional breast MRI for improved positive predictive value.
Savannah C Partridge, Wendy B DeMartini, +3 authors, Constance D Lehman.
AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2009 Nov 26; 193(6). PMID: 19933670
Sensitivity and specificity of unenhanced MR mammography (DWI combined with T2-weighted TSE imaging, ueMRM) for the differentiation of mass lesions.
Pascal A T Baltzer, Matthias Benndorf, +3 authors, Werner A Kaiser.
Eur Radiol, 2009 Nov 26; 20(5). PMID: 19936758
Effects of age, breast density, ethnicity, and estrogen replacement therapy on screening mammographic sensitivity and cancer stage at diagnosis: review of 183,134 screening mammograms in Albuquerque, New Mexico.
R D Rosenberg, W C Hunt, +5 authors, M N Linver.
Radiology, 1998 Nov 10; 209(2). PMID: 9807581
Problem solving MR imaging of the breast.
Carol H Lee.
Radiol Clin North Am, 2004 Sep 01; 42(5). PMID: 15337425
Review.
Likelihood ratios for modern screening mammography. Risk of breast cancer based on age and mammographic interpretation.
K Kerlikowske, D Grady, +2 authors, V Ernster.
JAMA, 1996 Jul 03; 276(1). PMID: 8667537
Assessment of breast lesions with diffusion-weighted MRI: comparing the use of different b values.
Fernanda Philadelpho Arantes Pereira, Gabriela Martins, +4 authors, Emerson Leandro Gasparetto.
AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2009 Sep 23; 193(4). PMID: 19770326
Diffusion-weighted imaging in breast cancer: relationship between apparent diffusion coefficient and tumour aggressiveness.
M Costantini, P Belli, +5 authors, L Bonomo.
Clin Radiol, 2010 Nov 13; 65(12). PMID: 21070905
Mechanism of contrast enhancement in breast lesions at MR imaging.
B Boné, M K Wiberg, +3 authors, A Gad.
Acta Radiol, 1998 Oct 02; 39(5). PMID: 9755697
Differentiation of clinically benign and malignant breast lesions using diffusion-weighted imaging.
Yong Guo, You-Quan Cai, +5 authors, Jia-Hong Gao.
J Magn Reson Imaging, 2002 Aug 31; 16(2). PMID: 12203765
Highly Cited.
Comparison of breast cancer detection by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and mammography.
Miho I Yoshikawa, Shozo Ohsumi, +4 authors, Teruhito Mochizuki.
Radiat Med, 2007 Jun 22; 25(5). PMID: 17581710
MRI of the breast.
S C Rankin.
Br J Radiol, 2000 Oct 12; 73(872). PMID: 11026854
Review.
ADC mapping of benign and malignant breast tumors.
Reiko Woodhams, Keiji Matsunaga, +6 authors, Kazushige Hayakawa.
Magn Reson Med Sci, 2005 Aug 30; 4(1). PMID: 16127252
Enhanced mass on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: Lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images.
Hidetake Yabuuchi, Yoshio Matsuo, +9 authors, Hiroshi Honda.
J Magn Reson Imaging, 2008 Oct 31; 28(5). PMID: 18972357
Breast carcinoma: effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach.
U Fischer, L Kopka, E Grabbe.
Radiology, 1999 Dec 02; 213(3). PMID: 10580970
Highly Cited.
Diffusion-weighted half-Fourier single-shot turbo spin echo imaging in breast tumors: differentiation of invasive ductal carcinoma from fibroadenoma.
Takahiro Kinoshita, Naobumi Yashiro, +3 authors, Makoto Narita.
J Comput Assist Tomogr, 2002 Dec 19; 26(6). PMID: 12488758
Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the breast: Evaluation of ipsilateral increased vascularity and adjacent vessel sign in the characterization of breast lesions.
Sibel Kul, Aysegül Cansu, +3 authors, Gamze Çan.
AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2010 Oct 23; 195(5). PMID: 20966336
Correlation of histologic grade of breast carcinoma with cytologic features on fine-needle aspiration of the breast.
B S Ducatman, S T Emery, H H Wang.
Mod Pathol, 1993 Sep 01; 6(5). PMID: 8248109
Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: quantitative method for kinetic curve type assessment.
Riham H El Khouli, Katarzyna J Macura, +4 authors, David A Bluemke.
AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2009 Sep 23; 193(4). PMID: 19770298    Free PMC article.
Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer.
Wendie A Berg, Jeffrey D Blume, +14 authors, ACRIN 6666 Investigators.
JAMA, 2008 May 15; 299(18). PMID: 18477782    Free PMC article.
Highly Cited.
Dynamic MR imaging of the breast. Analysis of kinetic and morphologic diagnostic criteria.
B K Szabó, P Aspelin, M Kristoffersen Wiberg, B Boné.
Acta Radiol, 2003 Jul 09; 44(4). PMID: 12846687
Nonpalpable breast tumors: diagnosis with contrast-enhanced subtraction dynamic MR imaging.
R Gilles, J M Guinebretière, +6 authors, D Vanel.
Radiology, 1994 Jun 01; 191(3). PMID: 8184038
[Application of diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging to differential diagnosis of breast diseases].
Jian-Dong Luo, Yuan-Yuan Liu, Xue-Lin Zhang, Ling-Chun Shi.
Ai Zheng, 2007 Feb 15; 26(2). PMID: 17298747
The role of diffusion-weighted imaging and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values for breast tumors.
Mi Jung Park, Eun Suk Cha, +2 authors, Jun Hyun Baik.
Korean J Radiol, 2007 Oct 10; 8(5). PMID: 17923781    Free PMC article.
Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography.
Patricia A Carney, Diana L Miglioretti, +9 authors, Rachel Ballard-Barbash.
Ann Intern Med, 2003 Feb 01; 138(3). PMID: 12558355
Highly Cited.
Increased risk of second malignancies after in situ breast carcinoma in a population-based registry.
I Soerjomataram, W J Louwman, +2 authors, J W W Coebergh.
Br J Cancer, 2006 Jun 29; 95(3). PMID: 16804522    Free PMC article.
Apparent diffusion coefficients of breast tumors: clinical application.
Masamitsu Hatakenaka, Hiroyasu Soeda, +5 authors, Hiroshi Honda.
Magn Reson Med Sci, 2008 May 08; 7(1). PMID: 18460845
Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations.
Thomas M Kolb, Jacob Lichy, Jeffrey H Newhouse.
Radiology, 2002 Oct 02; 225(1). PMID: 12355001
Highly Cited.
Diffusion weighted imaging in breast MRI: comparison of two different pulse sequences.
Evelyn Wenkel, Christian Geppert, +4 authors, Rolf Janka.
Acad Radiol, 2007 Aug 21; 14(9). PMID: 17707315
What is the lifetime risk of developing cancer?: the effect of adjusting for multiple primaries.
P D Sasieni, J Shelton, +2 authors, P B Silcocks.
Br J Cancer, 2011 Jul 21; 105(3). PMID: 21772332    Free PMC article.
Quantitative diffusion weighted imaging for differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions: the influence of the choice of b-values.
Nicky H G M Peters, Koen L Vincken, +3 authors, Lambertus W Bartels.
J Magn Reson Imaging, 2010 May 01; 31(5). PMID: 20432344
Is the necrosis/wall ADC ratio useful for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions?
Irmak Durur-Subasi, Afak Durur-Karakaya, +3 authors, Fatih Alper.
Br J Radiol, 2017 Mar 25; 90(1073). PMID: 28339285    Free PMC article.
Differentiation of Breast Lesions and Distinguishing Their Histological Subtypes Using Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and ADC Values.
Jelena Maric, Jasmina Boban, +3 authors, Dragana Bogdanovic-Stojanovic.
Front Oncol, 2020 Apr 02; 10. PMID: 32232007    Free PMC article.
Diffusion weighted imaging in breast cancer - Can it be a noninvasive predictor of nuclear grade?
R Rupa, R Thushara, +3 authors, Mathew P Cherian.
Indian J Radiol Imaging, 2020 Jun 02; 30(1). PMID: 32476745    Free PMC article.