Journal Article
. 2018 Aug; 4(1):e27.
doi: 10.1016/j.pbj.0000000000000027.

Correlation between apparent diffusion coefficient values in breast magnetic resonance imaging and prognostic factors of breast invasive ductal carcinoma

Ricardo Moutinho-Guilherme 1 Janeth Hercilia Oyola 1 David Sanz-Rosa 2 Israel Thuissard Vassallo 2 Raquel Murillo García 3 Joana Martins Pisco 1 Vicente Martínez de Vega 1 
Affiliations
  • PMID: 31595254
  •     46 References

Abstract

Background: We wanted to examine whether the apparent diffusion coefficient values obtained by diffusion-weighted imaging techniques could indicate an early prognostic assessment for patients with Invasive Ductal Carcinoma and, therefore, influence the treatment decision making.

Objective: The main objective was to evaluate the correlation between the apparent diffusion coefficient values obtained by diffusion-weighted imaging and the key prognostic factors in breast invasive ductal carcinoma. Secondary objectives were to analyze the eventual correlations between magnetic resonance imaging findings and prognostic factors in breast cancer; and to perform a comparison between results in 1.5 and 3.0 T scanners.

Methods: Breast magnetic resonance imaging with diffusion-weighted imaging sequence was performed on 100 patients, who were proven histopathologically to have breast invasive ductal carcinoma. We compared the apparent diffusion coefficient values, obtained previous to biopsy, with the main prognostic factors in breast cancer: tumor size, histologic grade, hormonal receptors, Ki67 index, human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2, and axillary lymph node status. The Mann-Whitney U test and the Kruskal-Wallis analysis were used to establish these correlations.

Results: The mean apparent diffusion coefficient value was inferior in the estrogen receptor-positive group than in the estrogen receptor-negative group (1.04 vs 1.17 × 10-3 mm2/s, P = .004). Higher histologic grade related to larger tumor size (P = .002). We found association between spiculated margins and positive axillary lymph node status [odds ratio = 4.35 (1.49-12.71)]. There were no differences in apparent diffusion coefficient measurements between 1.5 and 3.0 T magnetic resonance imaging scanners (P = .513).

Conclusions: Low apparent diffusion coefficient values are related with positive expression of estrogen receptor. Larger tumors and spiculated margins are associated to worse prognosis. Rim enhancement is more frequently observed in estrogen receptor-negative tumors. There are no differences in apparent diffusion coefficient measurements between different magnetic resonance imaging scanners.

Keywords: breast ductal carcinoma; breast neoplasms; diffusion magnetic resonance imaging; magnetic resonance imaging; prognosis.

Diffusion-weighted MR imaging: pretreatment prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer.
Sang Hee Park, Woo Kyung Moon, +5 authors, Dong-Young Noh.
Radiology, 2010 Sep 21; 257(1). PMID: 20851939
Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging: multicenter study.
Mitchell D Schnall, Jeffrey Blume, +14 authors, Constantine A Gatsonis.
Radiology, 2005 Dec 24; 238(1). PMID: 16373758
Highly Cited.
Assessment of breast lesions with diffusion-weighted MRI: comparing the use of different b values.
Fernanda Philadelpho Arantes Pereira, Gabriela Martins, +4 authors, Emerson Leandro Gasparetto.
AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2009 Sep 23; 193(4). PMID: 19770326
Diffusion-weighted MRI in the body: applications and challenges in oncology.
Dow-Mu Koh, David J Collins.
AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2007 May 23; 188(6). PMID: 17515386
Highly Cited. Review.
Diffusion-weighted half-Fourier single-shot turbo spin echo imaging in breast tumors: differentiation of invasive ductal carcinoma from fibroadenoma.
Takahiro Kinoshita, Naobumi Yashiro, +3 authors, Makoto Narita.
J Comput Assist Tomogr, 2002 Dec 19; 26(6). PMID: 12488758
Correlations between diffusion-weighted imaging and breast cancer biomarkers.
Laura Martincich, Veronica Deantoni, +9 authors, Filippo Montemurro.
Eur Radiol, 2012 Mar 14; 22(7). PMID: 22411304
Triple-negative breast cancer types exhibit a distinct poor clinical characteristic in lymph node-negative Chinese patients.
Zhe-Bin Liu, Guang-Yu Liu, +6 authors, Jiong Wu.
Oncol Rep, 2008 Sep 25; 20(4). PMID: 18813844
Apparent diffusion coefficient in pancreatic cancer: characterization and histopathological correlations.
Noriaki Muraoka, Hidemasa Uematsu, +5 authors, Harumi Itoh.
J Magn Reson Imaging, 2008 May 28; 27(6). PMID: 18504750
Utility of the apparent diffusion coefficient for distinguishing clear cell renal cell carcinoma of low and high nuclear grade.
Andrew B Rosenkrantz, Benjamin E Niver, +3 authors, Jonathan Melamed.
AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2010 Oct 23; 195(5). PMID: 20966299
MR imaging of the breast.
S G Orel.
Radiol Clin North Am, 2000 Aug 16; 38(4). PMID: 10943285
Review.
Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition.
Mieke Kriege, Cecile T M Brekelmans, +16 authors, Magnetic Resonance Imaging Screening Study Group.
N Engl J Med, 2004 Jul 30; 351(5). PMID: 15282350
Highly Cited.
Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging: a biomarker for treatment response in oncology.
Daniel A Hamstra, Alnawaz Rehemtulla, Brian D Ross.
J Clin Oncol, 2007 Sep 11; 25(26). PMID: 17827460
Highly Cited. Review.
Correlations between apparent diffusion coefficient values of invasive ductal carcinoma and pathologic factors on diffusion-weighted MRI at 3.0 Tesla.
Sung Hee Park, Hye-Young Choi, Soo Yeon Hahn.
J Magn Reson Imaging, 2013 Dec 20; 41(1). PMID: 24353241
Invasive breast cancer: correlation of dynamic MR features with prognostic factors.
Botond K Szabó, Peter Aspelin, +2 authors, Beata Boné.
Eur Radiol, 2003 Aug 05; 13(11). PMID: 12898176
Diffusion-weighted imaging of the breast: principles and clinical applications.
Reiko Woodhams, Saadallah Ramadan, +5 authors, Yusuke Inoue.
Radiographics, 2011 Jul 20; 31(4). PMID: 21768239
Quantitative diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the differential diagnosis of breast lesion.
C Marini, C Iacconi, +3 authors, C Bartolozzi.
Eur Radiol, 2007 Mar 16; 17(10). PMID: 17356840
Invasive ductal carcinoma: correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient value with pathological prognostic factors.
Ahmed Abdel Khalek Abdel Razek, Gada Gaballa, Adel Denewer, Nadia Nada.
NMR Biomed, 2010 Mar 17; 23(6). PMID: 20232453
Suspicious breast lesions: MR imaging with radiologic-pathologic correlation.
S G Orel, M D Schnall, V A LiVolsi, R H Troupin.
Radiology, 1994 Feb 01; 190(2). PMID: 8284404
Triple-negative breast cancer: correlation between MR imaging and pathologic findings.
Takayoshi Uematsu, Masako Kasami, Sachiko Yuen.
Radiology, 2009 Feb 27; 250(3). PMID: 19244039
Identification of residual breast carcinoma following neoadjuvant chemotherapy: diffusion-weighted imaging--comparison with contrast-enhanced MR imaging and pathologic findings.
Reiko Woodhams, Satoko Kakita, +6 authors, Carolyn Mountford.
Radiology, 2010 Jan 23; 254(2). PMID: 20093508
Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer.
C W Elston, I O Ellis, S E Pinder.
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol, 1999 Oct 26; 31(3). PMID: 10532196
Review.
Diffusion-weighted EPI of cystic ovarian lesions: evaluation of cystic contents using apparent diffusion coefficients.
T Moteki, H Ishizaka.
J Magn Reson Imaging, 2000 Dec 06; 12(6). PMID: 11105044
Endorectal diffusion-weighted imaging in prostate cancer to differentiate malignant and benign peripheral zone tissue.
Keyanoosh Hosseinzadeh, Samuel David Schwarz.
J Magn Reson Imaging, 2004 Sep 25; 20(4). PMID: 15390142
Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient at 3.0t: Correlation with prognostic factors and subtypes of invasive ductal carcinoma.
Eun Jeong Kim, Sung Hun Kim, +8 authors, Robert Grimm.
J Magn Reson Imaging, 2015 Apr 29; 42(6). PMID: 25919239
Clinical characteristics of different histologic types of breast cancer.
C I Li, D J Uribe, J R Daling.
Br J Cancer, 2005 Sep 22; 93(9). PMID: 16175185    Free PMC article.
Highly Cited.
Correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficiency values on diffusion-weighted imaging with prognostic factors for breast cancer.
S Y Choi, Y-W Chang, +3 authors, D Y Seo.
Br J Radiol, 2011 Dec 01; 85(1016). PMID: 22128125    Free PMC article.
Mucin-producing tumor of the pancreas: diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR imaging.
Y Yamashita, T Namimoto, +4 authors, M Ogawa.
Radiology, 1998 Sep 02; 208(3). PMID: 9722835
Diffusion-weighted single-shot echoplanar MR imaging for liver disease.
T Kim, T Murakami, +3 authors, H Nakamura.
AJR Am J Roentgenol, 1999 Aug 03; 173(2). PMID: 10430143
New prognostic factors in breast cancer.
Adam Adam Maciejczyk.
Adv Clin Exp Med, 2013 Mar 08; 22(1). PMID: 23468257
Review.
Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A preliminary study of the effect of region of interest on ADC values and interobserver variability.
Chao Ma, Li Liu, +5 authors, Jian-Ping Lu.
J Magn Reson Imaging, 2015 Jul 18; 43(2). PMID: 26182908
In vivo diffusion-weighted MRI of the breast: potential for lesion characterization.
Shantanu Sinha, Flora Anne Lucas-Quesada, +2 authors, Lawrence W Bassett.
J Magn Reson Imaging, 2002 Jul 12; 15(6). PMID: 12112520
Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up.
C W Elston, I O Ellis.
Histopathology, 1991 Nov 01; 19(5). PMID: 1757079
Highly Cited.
Estrogen receptor-alpha in the inhibition of cancer growth and angiogenesis.
S H Ali, A L O'Donnell, +5 authors, P Dandona.
Cancer Res, 2001 Jan 13; 60(24). PMID: 11156416
Differentiation of clinically benign and malignant breast lesions using diffusion-weighted imaging.
Yong Guo, You-Quan Cai, +5 authors, Jia-Hong Gao.
J Magn Reson Imaging, 2002 Aug 31; 16(2). PMID: 12203765
Highly Cited.
Correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficient value and dynamic magnetic resonance imaging findings with prognostic factors in invasive ductal carcinoma.
Su Kyung Jeh, Sung Hun Kim, +4 authors, Byung Joo Song.
J Magn Reson Imaging, 2010 Dec 25; 33(1). PMID: 21182127
Estrogen receptor-negative invasive breast cancer: imaging features of tumors with and without human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 overexpression.
Yingbing Wang, Debra M Ikeda, +5 authors, Stefanie S Jeffrey.
Radiology, 2008 Jan 09; 246(2). PMID: 18180338
Correlations between apparent diffusion coefficient values and prognostic factors of breast cancer.
Takeshi Kamitani, Yoshio Matsuo, +10 authors, Hiroshi Honda.
Magn Reson Med Sci, 2013 Jul 17; 12(3). PMID: 23857151
Relation between cancer cellularity and apparent diffusion coefficient values using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer.
Miho I Yoshikawa, Shozo Ohsumi, +5 authors, Yutaka Imai.
Radiat Med, 2008 May 30; 26(4). PMID: 18509722
Triple-negative breast carcinoma: current and emerging concepts.
Robert Schmadeka, Bryan E Harmon, Meenakshi Singh.
Am J Clin Pathol, 2014 Mar 13; 141(4). PMID: 24619745
Highly Cited. Review.
Apparent diffusion coefficient value of diffusion-weighted imaging for hepatocellular carcinoma: correlation with the histologic differentiation and the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor.
Suk Hee Heo, Yong Yeon Jeong, +6 authors, Heoung Keun Kang.
Korean J Radiol, 2010 May 13; 11(3). PMID: 20461183    Free PMC article.
Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer characterisation: correlations between the apparent diffusion coefficient and major prognostic factors.
Paolo Belli, Melania Costantini, +4 authors, Lorenzo Bonomo.
Radiol Med, 2014 Aug 07; 120(3). PMID: 25096888
Prognostic molecular markers in early breast cancer.
Francisco J Esteva, Gabriel N Hortobagyi.
Breast Cancer Res, 2004 Apr 16; 6(3). PMID: 15084231    Free PMC article.
Review.
Trends in incidence rates of invasive lobular and ductal breast carcinoma.
Christopher I Li, Benjamin O Anderson, Janet R Daling, Roger E Moe.
JAMA, 2003 Mar 15; 289(11). PMID: 12636465
Region of interest demarcation for quantification of the apparent diffusion coefficient in breast lesions and its interobserver variability.
Luísa Nogueira, Sofia Brandão, +4 authors, Isabel Ramos.
Diagn Interv Radiol, 2015 Feb 24; 21(2). PMID: 25698095    Free PMC article.
Diffusion-weighted imaging of breast cancer: correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficient value with prognostic factors.
Sung Hun Kim, Eun Suk Cha, +5 authors, Young Jin Suh.
J Magn Reson Imaging, 2009 Aug 28; 30(3). PMID: 19711411
Magnetic resonance imaging of breast cancer and correlation with prognostic factors.
Yun-Woo Chang, Kui Hyang Kwon, +6 authors, Dae Young Seo.
Acta Radiol, 2009 Oct 30; 50(9). PMID: 19863408