Journal Article
. 2019 Oct;19(1).
doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-6201-4.

Can apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) distinguish breast cancer from benign breast findings? A meta-analysis based on 13 847 lesions

Alexey Surov 1 Hans Jonas Meyer 2 Andreas Wienke 3 
Affiliations
  • PMID: 31615463
  •     146 References
  •     7 citations

Abstract

Background: The purpose of the present meta-analysis was to provide evident data about use of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) values for distinguishing malignant and benign breast lesions.

Methods: MEDLINE library and SCOPUS database were screened for associations between ADC and malignancy/benignancy of breast lesions up to December 2018. Overall, 123 items were identified. The following data were extracted from the literature: authors, year of publication, study design, number of patients/lesions, lesion type, mean value and standard deviation of ADC, measure method, b values, and Tesla strength. The methodological quality of the 123 studies was checked according to the QUADAS-2 instrument. The meta-analysis was undertaken by using RevMan 5.3 software. DerSimonian and Laird random-effects models with inverse-variance weights were used without any further correction to account for the heterogeneity between the studies. Mean ADC values including 95% confidence intervals were calculated separately for benign and malign lesions.

Results: The acquired 123 studies comprised 13,847 breast lesions. Malignant lesions were diagnosed in 10,622 cases (76.7%) and benign lesions in 3225 cases (23.3%). The mean ADC value of the malignant lesions was 1.03 × 10- 3 mm2/s and the mean value of the benign lesions was 1.5 × 10- 3 mm2/s. The calculated ADC values of benign lesions were over the value of 1.00 × 10- 3 mm2/s. This result was independent on Tesla strength, choice of b values, and measure methods (whole lesion measure vs estimation of ADC in a single area).

Conclusion: An ADC threshold of 1.00 × 10- 3 mm2/s can be recommended for distinguishing breast cancers from benign lesions.

Keywords: ADC; Breast cancer; MRI.

Conspicuity of breast lesions at different b values on diffusion-weighted imaging.
Xin Chen, Xi-Jing He, +5 authors, Qian Wu.
BMC Cancer, 2012 Aug 03; 12. PMID: 22853049    Free PMC article.
Meta-analysis in clinical trials.
R DerSimonian, N Laird.
Control Clin Trials, 1986 Sep 01; 7(3). PMID: 3802833
Highly Cited.
Value of diffusion-weighted MRI in the differentiation of benign and malign breast lesions.
G Sonmez, F Cuce, +6 authors, E Kizilkaya.
Wien Klin Wochenschr, 2011 Sep 17; 123(21-22). PMID: 21922210
Comparison of the diagnostic performances of diffusion parameters in diffusion weighted imaging and diffusion tensor imaging of breast lesions.
Ozgur Cakir, Arzu Arslan, +4 authors, Gur Akansel.
Eur J Radiol, 2013 Oct 09; 82(12). PMID: 24099642
Nonmalignant breast lesions: ADCs of benign and high-risk subtypes assessed as false-positive at dynamic enhanced MR imaging.
Sana Parsian, Habib Rahbar, +4 authors, Savannah C Partridge.
Radiology, 2012 Oct 04; 265(3). PMID: 23033500    Free PMC article.
Diffusion-weighted MRI Findings Predict Pathologic Response in Neoadjuvant Treatment of Breast Cancer: The ACRIN 6698 Multicenter Trial.
Savannah C Partridge, Zheng Zhang, +17 authors, ACRIN 6698 Trial Team and I-SPY 2 Trial Investigators.
Radiology, 2018 Sep 05; 289(3). PMID: 30179110    Free PMC article.
Highly Cited.
Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value to evaluate BI-RADS 4 breast lesions: correlation with pathological findings.
Yazmín Aseret Ramírez-Galván, Servando Cardona-Huerta, Elfa Ibarra-Fombona, Guillermo Elizondo-Riojas.
Clin Imaging, 2014 Dec 03; 39(1). PMID: 25457520
Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in focal breast lesions: analysis of 78 cases with pathological correlation.
F Fornasa, L Pinali, +2 authors, S Montemezzi.
Radiol Med, 2010 Nov 16; 116(2). PMID: 21076884
Meta-DiSc: a software for meta-analysis of test accuracy data.
Javier Zamora, Victor Abraira, +2 authors, Arri Coomarasamy.
BMC Med Res Methodol, 2006 Jul 14; 6. PMID: 16836745    Free PMC article.
Highly Cited.
Diffusion-weighted imaging (b value = 1500 s/mm(2)) is useful to decrease false-positive breast cancer cases due to fibrocystic changes.
Miho Ochi, Toshiro Kuroiwa, +6 authors, Masamitsu Hatakenaka.
Breast Cancer, 2011 Dec 14; 20(2). PMID: 22161277
MRI-only lesions: application of diffusion-weighted imaging obviates unnecessary MR-guided breast biopsies.
Claudio Spick, Katja Pinker-Domenig, +2 authors, Pascal A Baltzer.
Eur Radiol, 2014 Apr 08; 24(6). PMID: 24706105
Value of diffusion weighted imaging in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions at 3.0T MRI.
X Y Jiang, Q Z Xie, +3 authors, X L Li.
Genet Mol Res, 2014 Oct 10; 13(3). PMID: 25299091
Contribution of IVIM to Conventional Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced and Diffusion-Weighted MRI in Differentiating Benign from Malignant Breast Masses.
Qingjun Wang, Yong Guo, +3 authors, Yun Zhang.
Breast Care (Basel), 2016 Oct 11; 11(4). PMID: 27721712    Free PMC article.
Rim sign and histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient values on diffusion-weighted MRI in triple-negative breast cancer: Comparison with ER-positive subtype.
Yangsean Choi, Sung Hun Kim, +3 authors, Ahwon Lee.
PLoS One, 2017 May 26; 12(5). PMID: 28542297    Free PMC article.
Diffusion-weighted imaging in assessing pathological response of tumor in breast cancer subtype to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Shangang Liu, Ruimei Ren, +4 authors, Pinliang Zhang.
J Magn Reson Imaging, 2015 Jan 13; 42(3). PMID: 25580585
Differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast masses using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.
Qinghua Min, Kangwei Shao, +4 authors, Jun Yang.
World J Surg Oncol, 2015 Apr 19; 13. PMID: 25889380    Free PMC article.
Apparent diffusion coefficient as an MR imaging biomarker of low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ: a pilot study.
Mami Iima, Denis Le Bihan, +7 authors, Kaori Togashi.
Radiology, 2011 Jun 03; 260(2). PMID: 21633054
Assessment of breast lesions with diffusion-weighted MRI: comparing the use of different b values.
Fernanda Philadelpho Arantes Pereira, Gabriela Martins, +4 authors, Emerson Leandro Gasparetto.
AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2009 Sep 23; 193(4). PMID: 19770326
Diffusion-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging: What Makes Water Run Fast or Slow?
Francesca Fornasa.
J Clin Imaging Sci, 2011 Oct 04; 1. PMID: 21966624    Free PMC article.
Differentiation Between Luminal-A and Luminal-B Breast Cancer Using Intravoxel Incoherent Motion and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Hiroko Kawashima, Tosiaki Miyati, +4 authors, Toshifumi Gabata.
Acad Radiol, 2017 Aug 06; 24(12). PMID: 28778511
Correlation between electrical conductivity and apparent diffusion coefficient in breast cancer: effect of necrosis on magnetic resonance imaging.
Soo-Yeon Kim, Jaewook Shin, +5 authors, Min Jung Kim.
Eur Radiol, 2018 Mar 08; 28(8). PMID: 29511804
Improved diagnostic accuracy of breast MRI through combined apparent diffusion coefficients and dynamic contrast-enhanced kinetics.
S C Partridge, H Rahbar, +4 authors, C D Lehman.
Magn Reson Med, 2011 Jan 22; 65(6). PMID: 21254208    Free PMC article.
Quantitative diffusion imaging in breast cancer: a clinical prospective study.
Erika Rubesova, Anne-Sophie Grell, +3 authors, Marc Lemort.
J Magn Reson Imaging, 2006 Jun 21; 24(2). PMID: 16786565
Systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy.
Mariska M G Leeflang, Jonathan J Deeks, +2 authors, Cochrane Diagnostic Test Accuracy Working Group.
Ann Intern Med, 2008 Dec 17; 149(12). PMID: 19075208    Free PMC article.
Highly Cited.
Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of benign and malignant breast lesions before and after contrast enhancement.
R Janka, M Hammon, +3 authors, E Wenkel.
Rofo, 2013 Aug 10; 186(2). PMID: 23929263
Can diffusion-weighted imaging add information in the evaluation of breast lesions considered suspicious on magnetic resonance imaging?
Camila Souza Guatelli, Almir Galvão Vieira Bitencourt, +5 authors, Rubens Chojniak.
Radiol Bras, 2017 Nov 01; 50(5). PMID: 29085162    Free PMC article.
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.
David Moher, Alessandro Liberati, +2 authors, PRISMA Group.
PLoS Med, 2009 Jul 22; 6(7). PMID: 19621072    Free PMC article.
Highly Cited.
Improving malignancy prediction in breast lesions with the combination of apparent diffusion coefficient and dynamic contrast-enhanced kinetic descriptors.
Luisa Nogueira, Sofia Brandão, +4 authors, Isabel Ramos.
Clin Radiol, 2015 Jul 03; 70(9). PMID: 26135541
Feasibility study of dual parametric 2D histogram analysis of breast lesions with dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MRI.
Yanqiong Chen, Bin Wu, +2 authors, Yajia Gu.
J Transl Med, 2018 Nov 25; 16(1). PMID: 30470241    Free PMC article.
Correlation between 3T apparent diffusion coefficient values and grading of invasive breast carcinoma.
Valentina Cipolla, Domiziana Santucci, +3 authors, Carlo de Felice.
Eur J Radiol, 2014 Oct 12; 83(12). PMID: 25305145
Assessment of breast mass morphology with diffusion-weighted MRI: Beyond apparent diffusion coefficient.
Sibel Kul, Yavuz Metin, +3 authors, Oguzhan Ozdemir.
J Magn Reson Imaging, 2018 May 08; 48(6). PMID: 29734493
Diffusion weighted imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient in 3 tesla magnetic resonance imaging of breast lesions.
Rocchina Caivano, Antonio Villonio, +9 authors, Aldo Cammarota.
Cancer Invest, 2015 Apr 02; 33(5). PMID: 25831024
Diffusion-weighted imaging with fat suppression using short-tau inversion recovery: Clinical utility for diagnosis of breast lesions.
Z Ouyang, Y Ouyang, +5 authors, G Ren.
Clin Radiol, 2014 May 20; 69(8). PMID: 24837698
An Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Histogram Method Versus a Traditional 2-Dimensional Measurement Method for Identifying Non-Puerperal Mastitis From Breast Cancer at 3.0 T.
Qi Tang, Qiang Li, +6 authors, Danke Su.
J Comput Assist Tomogr, 2018 May 23; 42(5). PMID: 29787501
Diffusion-weighted imaging: determination of the best pair of b-values to discriminate breast lesions.
L Nogueira, S Brandão, +4 authors, I Ramos.
Br J Radiol, 2014 May 17; 87(1039). PMID: 24834475    Free PMC article.
Intraobserver and interobserver variability in the calculation of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) from diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) of breast tumours.
G Petralia, L Bonello, +8 authors, M Bellomi.
Radiol Med, 2011 Jan 13; 116(3). PMID: 21225368
Quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient measurement obtained by 3.0Tesla MRI as a potential noninvasive marker of tumor aggressiveness in breast cancer.
Manuela Durando, Lucas Gennaro, +7 authors, Sunitha B Thakur.
Eur J Radiol, 2016 Aug 10; 85(9). PMID: 27501902    Free PMC article.
Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast prior to biopsy.
David A Bluemke, Constantine A Gatsonis, +14 authors, Mitchell D Schnall.
JAMA, 2004 Dec 09; 292(22). PMID: 15585733
Highly Cited.
Potential of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in the Characterization of Malignant, Benign, and Healthy Breast Tissues and Molecular Subtypes of Breast Cancer.
Uma Sharma, Rani G Sah, +5 authors, Naranamangalam R Jagannathan.
Front Oncol, 2016 Jun 01; 6. PMID: 27242965    Free PMC article.
Diffusion-weighted MRI of breast lesions: a prospective clinical investigation of the quantitative imaging biomarker characteristics of reproducibility, repeatability, and diagnostic accuracy.
Claudio Spick, Hubert Bickel, +9 authors, Pascal A Baltzer.
NMR Biomed, 2016 Aug 25; 29(10). PMID: 27553252
Prediction of tumor differentiation using sequential PET/CT and MRI in patients with breast cancer.
Joon Ho Choi, Ilhan Lim, +9 authors, Sang Moo Lim.
Ann Nucl Med, 2018 May 26; 32(6). PMID: 29797002
Additional Value of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging to Evaluate Prognostic Factors of Breast Cancer: Correlation with the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient.
Eun Kyung Park, Kyu Ran Cho, +3 authors, Jeoung Won Bae.
Iran J Radiol, 2016 Apr 30; 13(1). PMID: 27127582    Free PMC article.
Differentiation of malignant and benign breast lesions: Added value of the qualitative analysis of breast lesions on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) using readout-segmented echo-planar imaging at 3.0 T.
Yeong Yi An, Sung Hun Kim, Bong Joo Kang.
PLoS One, 2017 Mar 31; 12(3). PMID: 28358833    Free PMC article.
Diffusion-weighted imaging of breast masses: comparison of diagnostic performance using various apparent diffusion coefficient parameters.
Maki Hirano, Hiroko Satake, +3 authors, Shinji Naganawa.
AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2012 Feb 24; 198(3). PMID: 22358015
Diffusion-weighted imaging in breast lesion evaluation.
P Belli, M Costantini, +3 authors, L Bonomo.
Radiol Med, 2009 Nov 11; 115(1). PMID: 19902330
Correlation of Prognostic Factors of Invasive Lobular Carcinoma with ADC Value of DWI and SUVMax of FDG-PET.
Bo Bae Choi, Sung Hun Kim, Chang Suk Park, Na Young Jung.
Chonnam Med J, 2017 Jun 07; 53(2). PMID: 28584792    Free PMC article.
Meta-analysis of quantitative diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the differential diagnosis of breast lesions.
Xin Chen, Wen-ling Li, +3 authors, Zhi-lan Bai.
BMC Cancer, 2010 Dec 30; 10. PMID: 21189150    Free PMC article.
Apparent diffusion coefficient as a potential surrogate marker for Ki-67 index in mucinous breast carcinoma.
Natsuko Onishi, Shotaro Kanao, +7 authors, Kaori Togashi.
J Magn Reson Imaging, 2014 Mar 05; 41(3). PMID: 24590513
Risk stratification of ductal carcinoma in situ using whole-lesion histogram analysis of the apparent diffusion coefficient.
Jin You Kim, Jin Joo Kim, +6 authors, Robert Grimm.
Eur Radiol, 2018 Aug 04; 29(2). PMID: 30073498
QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies.
Penny F Whiting, Anne W S Rutjes, +7 authors, QUADAS-2 Group.
Ann Intern Med, 2011 Oct 19; 155(8). PMID: 22007046
Highly Cited.
A Simplified Approach to Measure the Effect of the Microvasculature in Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging Applied to Breast Tumors: Preliminary Results.
Jose R Teruel, Pål E Goa, +3 authors, Tone F Bathen.
Radiology, 2016 Oct 19; 281(2). PMID: 27128662
Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Invasive Ductal Breast Carcinoma: Correlation with Detailed Histologic Features and the Enhancement Ratio on Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Images.
Roka Namoto Matsubayashi, Teruhiko Fujii, +2 authors, Seiya Momosaki.
J Oncol, 2010 Sep 28; 2010. PMID: 20871661    Free PMC article.
Correlations between apparent diffusion coefficient values of invasive ductal carcinoma and pathologic factors on diffusion-weighted MRI at 3.0 Tesla.
Sung Hee Park, Hye-Young Choi, Soo Yeon Hahn.
J Magn Reson Imaging, 2013 Dec 20; 41(1). PMID: 24353241
ADC at 3.0 T as a noninvasive biomarker for preoperative prediction of Ki67 expression in invasive ductal carcinoma of breast.
Lu Shen, Guoxing Zhou, +6 authors, Lei Zhang.
Clin Imaging, 2018 Mar 05; 52. PMID: 29501957
Dual-Phase ADC Modelling of Breast Masses in Diffusion-Weighted Imaging: Comparison with Histopathologic Findings.
Gökhan Ertaş, Can Onaygil, Onur Buğdaycı, Erkin Arıbal.
Eur J Breast Health, 2018 May 19; 14(2). PMID: 29774316    Free PMC article.
Additional value of diffusion-weighted imaging to evaluate multifocal and multicentric breast cancer detected using pre-operative breast MRI.
Sung Eun Song, Eun Kyung Park, +4 authors, Sung Bum Cho.
Eur Radiol, 2017 Jun 09; 27(11). PMID: 28593433
Gadoterate meglumine decreases ADC values of breast lesions depending on the b value combination.
Otso Arponen, Mazen Sudah, +4 authors, Ritva Vanninen.
Sci Rep, 2018 Jan 10; 8(1). PMID: 29311709    Free PMC article.
Can diffusion-weighted imaging predict tumor grade and expression of Ki-67 in breast cancer? A multicenter analysis.
Alexey Surov, Paola Clauser, +6 authors, Andreas Wienke.
Breast Cancer Res, 2018 Jun 21; 20(1). PMID: 29921323    Free PMC article.
A Meta-analysis of the Diagnostic Performance of Diffusion MRI for Breast Lesion Characterization.
Gabrielle C Baxter, Martin J Graves, Fiona J Gilbert, Andrew J Patterson.
Radiology, 2019 Apr 24; 291(3). PMID: 31012817
Systematic Review.
Detection of invasive components in cases of breast ductal carcinoma in situ on biopsy by using apparent diffusion coefficient MR parameters.
Naoko Mori, Hideki Ota, +6 authors, Shoki Takahashi.
Eur Radiol, 2013 Jun 05; 23(10). PMID: 23732688
Invasive ductal carcinoma: correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient value with pathological prognostic factors.
Ahmed Abdel Khalek Abdel Razek, Gada Gaballa, Adel Denewer, Nadia Nada.
NMR Biomed, 2010 Mar 17; 23(6). PMID: 20232453
Diffusion-weighted imaging of breast cancer with the sensitivity encoding technique: analysis of the apparent diffusion coefficient value.
Yoshifumi Kuroki, Katsuhiro Nasu, +4 authors, Shigeru Nawano.
Magn Reson Med Sci, 2005 Aug 12; 3(2). PMID: 16093623
Histogram analysis of volume-based apparent diffusion coefficient in breast cancer.
Ga Eun Park, Sung Hun Kim, +2 authors, Mi Sun Park.
Acta Radiol, 2017 Mar 10; 58(11). PMID: 28273747
Applicability and discriminative value of a semiautomatic three-dimensional spherical volume for the assessment of the apparent diffusion coefficient in suspicious breast lesions-feasibility study.
Jan Hering, Frederik Bernd Laun, +7 authors, Sebastian Bickelhaupt.
Clin Imaging, 2016 Sep 30; 40(6). PMID: 27684995
Discrimination of malignant and benign breast masses using automatic segmentation and features extracted from dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MRI.
Xinhua Jiang, Fei Xie, +3 authors, Li Li.
Oncol Lett, 2018 Jul 17; 16(2). PMID: 30008832    Free PMC article.
FDG PET/CT and diffusion-weighted imaging for breast cancer: prognostic value of maximum standardized uptake values and apparent diffusion coefficient values of the primary lesion.
Masatoyo Nakajo, Yoriko Kajiya, +6 authors, Masayuki Nakajo.
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2010 Jul 08; 37(11). PMID: 20607535
Phyllodes tumor of the breast: correlation between MR findings and histologic grade.
Hidetake Yabuuchi, Hiroyasu Soeda, +9 authors, Hiroshi Honda.
Radiology, 2006 Oct 13; 241(3). PMID: 17032912
Differential diagnosis of mammographically and clinically occult breast lesions on diffusion-weighted MRI.
Savannah C Partridge, Wendy B Demartini, +3 authors, Constance D Lehman.
J Magn Reson Imaging, 2010 Feb 27; 31(3). PMID: 20187198
Multiparametric MRI model with dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted imaging enables breast cancer diagnosis with high accuracy.
Michelle Zhang, Joao V Horvat, +7 authors, Katja Pinker.
J Magn Reson Imaging, 2018 Oct 31; 49(3). PMID: 30375702    Free PMC article.
Accuracy of combined dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging for breast cancer detection: a meta-analysis.
Li Zhang, Min Tang, +3 authors, Xiaoling Zhang.
Acta Radiol, 2015 Aug 16; 57(6). PMID: 26275624
Diffusion-weighted imaging improves the diagnostic accuracy of conventional 3.0-T breast MR imaging.
Riham H Ei Khouli, Michael A Jacobs, +4 authors, David A Bluemke.
Radiology, 2010 Jun 25; 256(1). PMID: 20574085    Free PMC article.
Highly Cited.
Sensitivity and specificity of unenhanced MR mammography (DWI combined with T2-weighted TSE imaging, ueMRM) for the differentiation of mass lesions.
Pascal A T Baltzer, Matthias Benndorf, +3 authors, Werner A Kaiser.
Eur Radiol, 2009 Nov 26; 20(5). PMID: 19936758
Optimization of apparent diffusion coefficient measured by diffusion-weighted MRI for diagnosis of breast lesions presenting as mass and non-mass-like enhancement.
Liuquan Cheng, Yuhan Bai, +5 authors, Lin Ma.
Tumour Biol, 2013 Feb 12; 34(3). PMID: 23397543
Prognostic value of FDG-PET and DWI in breast cancer.
Kazuhiro Kitajima, Yasuo Miyoshi, +3 authors, Koichiro Yamakado.
Ann Nucl Med, 2017 Nov 15; 32(1). PMID: 29134565
The role of diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging in oncologic settings.
Zulkif Bozgeyik, Mehmet Ruhi Onur, Ahmet Kursad Poyraz.
Quant Imaging Med Surg, 2013 Nov 26; 3(5). PMID: 24273745    Free PMC article.
Diffusion-weighted imaging of suspicious (BI-RADS 4) breast lesions: stratification based on histopathology.
João Ricardo Maltez de Almeida, André Boechat Gomes, +2 authors, Mario de Souza Rocha.
Radiol Bras, 2017 Jul 04; 50(3). PMID: 28670026    Free PMC article.
Differentiation of triple-negative breast cancer from other subtypes through whole-tumor histogram analysis on multiparametric MR imaging.
Tianwen Xie, Qiufeng Zhao, +7 authors, Weijun Peng.
Eur Radiol, 2018 Nov 08; 29(5). PMID: 30402704
Preoperative predicting malignancy in breast mass-like lesions: value of adding histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient maps to dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for improving confidence level.
Hong-Li Liu, Min Zong, +5 authors, Yan-Ni Jiang.
Br J Radiol, 2017 Sep 07; 90(1079). PMID: 28876982    Free PMC article.
Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MRI of invasive breast cancer: Correlation with prognostic factors and kinetic features acquired with computer-aided diagnosis.
Sung Eun Song, Kyu Ran Cho, +4 authors, Robert Grimm.
J Magn Reson Imaging, 2018 Sep 22; 49(1). PMID: 30238533
Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Breast Tumors Using Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value Measured Through Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Rong-Feng Qu, Dong-Rui Guo, +5 authors, Jian Sun.
J Comput Assist Tomogr, 2015 Mar 19; 39(4). PMID: 25783797
Quantitative Analysis of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for Diagnosis of Puerperal Breast Abscess After Polyacrylamide Hydrogel Augmentation Mammoplasty: Compared with Other Conventional Modalities.
Lihua Liu, Miaomiao Long, +4 authors, Wen Shen.
Aesthetic Plast Surg, 2015 Jan 02; 39(1). PMID: 25552330
Diffusion Kurtosis at 3.0T as an in vivo Imaging Marker for Breast Cancer Characterization: Correlation With Prognostic Factors.
Yao Huang, Yan Lin, +7 authors, Renhua Wu.
J Magn Reson Imaging, 2018 Sep 28; 49(3). PMID: 30260589
Intravoxel incoherent motion magnetic resonance imaging for breast cancer: A comparison with benign lesions and evaluation of heterogeneity in different tumor regions with prognostic factors and molecular classification.
Ming Zhao, Kuang Fu, +6 authors, Jiawei Tian.
Oncol Lett, 2018 Sep 27; 16(4). PMID: 30250578    Free PMC article.
Detection of the differences in the apparent diffusion coefficient values in different histopathological types of malignant breast lesions and comparison of cellular region/ stroma ratio and histopathological results
Nevin Köremezli Keskin, Pınar Balcı, +4 authors, Ayça Erşen Danyeli.
Turk J Med Sci, 2018 Aug 19; 48(4). PMID: 30119158
The role of diffusion-weighted imaging and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values for breast tumors.
Mi Jung Park, Eun Suk Cha, +2 authors, Jun Hyun Baik.
Korean J Radiol, 2007 Oct 10; 8(5). PMID: 17923781    Free PMC article.
Accuracy and surgical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging: systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer.
Nehmat Houssami, Stefano Ciatto, +4 authors, Les Irwig.
J Clin Oncol, 2008 May 14; 26(19). PMID: 18474876
Highly Cited. Systematic Review.
Apparent diffusion coefficient in estrogen receptor-positive and lymph node-negative invasive breast cancers at 3.0T DW-MRI: A potential predictor for an oncotype Dx test recurrence score.
Sunitha B Thakur, Manuela Durando, +5 authors, Elizabeth A Morris.
J Magn Reson Imaging, 2017 Jun 24; 47(2). PMID: 28640531    Free PMC article.
Diffusion-weighted imaging in breast cancer: relationship between apparent diffusion coefficient and tumour aggressiveness.
M Costantini, P Belli, +5 authors, L Bonomo.
Clin Radiol, 2010 Nov 13; 65(12). PMID: 21070905
Diffusion-weighted MR imaging: role in the differential diagnosis of breast lesions.
C Altay, P Balci, +4 authors, O Dicle.
JBR-BTR, 2015 Jan 22; 97(4). PMID: 25603628
Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MRI at 3.0 T differentiates malignant breast lesions from benign lesions and breast parenchyma.
Louisa Bokacheva, Jennifer B Kaplan, +6 authors, Sunitha B Thakur.
J Magn Reson Imaging, 2013 Nov 26; 40(4). PMID: 24273096    Free PMC article.
Perfusion Parameters in Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MRI and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value in Diffusion-weighted MRI:: Association with Prognostic Factors in Breast Cancer.
Hyun Sil Lee, Sung Hun Kim, +2 authors, Byung Joo Song.
Acad Radiol, 2016 Feb 08; 23(4). PMID: 26852247
Diffusion-weighted MR for differentiation of breast lesions at 3.0 T: how does selection of diffusion protocols affect diagnosis?
Wolfgang Bogner, Stephan Gruber, +6 authors, Siegfried Trattnig.
Radiology, 2009 Aug 26; 253(2). PMID: 19703869
Usefulness of diffusion-weighted imaging of breast tumors: quantitative and visual assessment.
Kaiji Inoue, Eito Kozawa, +4 authors, Fumiko Kimura.
Jpn J Radiol, 2011 Jul 26; 29(6). PMID: 21786099
Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in 3.0 Tesla Breast MRI: Diagnostic Performance and Tumor Characterization Using Small Subregions vs. Whole Tumor Regions of Interest.
Otso Arponen, Otso Arponent, +9 authors, Ritva Vanninen.
PLoS One, 2015 Oct 13; 10(10). PMID: 26458106    Free PMC article.
Correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficiency values on diffusion-weighted imaging with prognostic factors for breast cancer.
S Y Choi, Y-W Chang, +3 authors, D Y Seo.
Br J Radiol, 2011 Dec 01; 85(1016). PMID: 22128125    Free PMC article.
Retrospective analysis of the utility of multiparametric MRI for differentiating between benign and malignant breast lesions in women in China.
Wei Xiong Fan, Xiao Feng Chen, +6 authors, Shuai Li.
Medicine (Baltimore), 2018 Jan 26; 97(4). PMID: 29369183    Free PMC article.
Diffusion-weighted imaging reflects variable cellularity and stromal density present in breast fibroadenomas.
Sana Parsian, Nadia V Giannakopoulos, +3 authors, Savannah C Partridge.
Clin Imaging, 2016 Jul 06; 40(5). PMID: 27379441    Free PMC article.
Diffusion weighted imaging for the differentiation of breast tumors: From apparent diffusion coefficient to high order diffusion tensor imaging.
Jose R Teruel, Pål E Goa, +3 authors, Tone F Bathen.
J Magn Reson Imaging, 2015 Oct 24; 43(5). PMID: 26494124
The diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted imaging and the apparent diffusion coefficient values in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions.
Gonca Çabuk, Meltem Nass Duce, +3 authors, Gülhan Orekici.
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol, 2015 Jan 08; 59(2). PMID: 25564776
Is there a correlation between 3T multiparametric MRI and molecular subtypes of breast cancer?
Stefania Montemezzi, Lucia Camera, +5 authors, Carlo Cavedon.
Eur J Radiol, 2018 Nov 07; 108. PMID: 30396643
Breast MRI: guidelines from the European Society of Breast Imaging.
R M Mann, C K Kuhl, K Kinkel, C Boetes.
Eur Radiol, 2008 Apr 05; 18(7). PMID: 18389253    Free PMC article.
Highly Cited.
Evaluation of breast cancer using intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) histogram analysis: comparison with malignant status, histological subtype, and molecular prognostic factors.
Gene Young Cho, Linda Moy, +5 authors, Eric E Sigmund.
Eur Radiol, 2015 Nov 30; 26(8). PMID: 26615557    Free PMC article.
Predictive value for malignancy of suspicious breast masses of BI-RADS categories 4 and 5 using ultrasound elastography and MR diffusion-weighted imaging.
Hiroko Satake, Akiko Nishio, +4 authors, Shinji Naganawa.
AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2010 Dec 24; 196(1). PMID: 21178068
In vivo assessment of ductal carcinoma in situ grade: a model incorporating dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted breast MR imaging parameters.
Habib Rahbar, Savannah C Partridge, +4 authors, Constance D Lehman.
Radiology, 2012 Apr 21; 263(2). PMID: 22517955    Free PMC article.
Heterogeneity of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Tumours and the Surrounding Stroma for Prediction of Ki-67 Proliferation Status in Breast Cancer.
Ming Fan, Ting He, +2 authors, Lihua Li.
Sci Rep, 2017 Jun 08; 7(1). PMID: 28588280    Free PMC article.
Two Different Methods of Region-of-Interest Placement for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions by Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value
Masoumeh Gity, Behnaz Moradi, +2 authors, Mohamad Ali Kazemi.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 2018 Oct 27; 19(10). PMID: 30360604    Free PMC article.
Parameters of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI as imaging markers for angiogenesis and proliferation in human breast cancer.
Lin Li, Kai Wang, +4 authors, Baozhong Shen.
Med Sci Monit, 2015 Feb 03; 21. PMID: 25640082    Free PMC article.
The role of diffusion weighted imaging as supplement to dynamic contrast enhanced breast MRI: Can it help predict malignancy, histologic grade and recurrence?
Shima Roknsharifi, Michael D C Fishman, +3 authors, Vandana Dialani.
Acad Radiol, 2018 Oct 09; 26(7). PMID: 30293819
Effects of magnetic field strength and b value on the sensitivity and specificity of quantitative breast diffusion-weighted MRI.
Mohammad Eghtedari, Jingfei Ma, +3 authors, Basak E Dogan.
Quant Imaging Med Surg, 2016 Oct 07; 6(4). PMID: 27709073    Free PMC article.
Quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient as a noninvasive imaging biomarker for the differentiation of invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ.
Hubert Bickel, Katja Pinker-Domenig, +5 authors, Pascal Baltzer.
Invest Radiol, 2014 Oct 22; 50(2). PMID: 25333308
Correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficient value and dynamic magnetic resonance imaging findings with prognostic factors in invasive ductal carcinoma.
Su Kyung Jeh, Sung Hun Kim, +4 authors, Byung Joo Song.
J Magn Reson Imaging, 2010 Dec 25; 33(1). PMID: 21182127
Comparison of contrast enhancement and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in healthy and cancerous breast tissue.
Gene Young Cho, Linda Moy, +5 authors, Eric E Sigmund.
Eur J Radiol, 2015 Jul 30; 84(10). PMID: 26220915
Multiparametric MR Imaging of Breast Cancer.
Habib Rahbar, Savannah C Partridge.
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am, 2015 Nov 29; 24(1). PMID: 26613883    Free PMC article.
Review.
Significance of the ADC ratio in the differential diagnosis of breast lesions.
Jinli Zhao, Haitao Guan, +3 authors, Xianhua Wu.
Acta Radiol, 2015 Jun 14; 57(4). PMID: 26071495
The role of apparent diffusion coefficient values in the differential diagnosis of breast lesions in diffusion-weighted MRI.
Cennet Şahin, Erkin Arıbal.
Diagn Interv Radiol, 2013 Sep 06; 19(6). PMID: 24004972
Differentiating benign and malignant inflammatory breast lesions: Value of T2 weighted and diffusion weighted MR images.
Shotaro Kanao, Masako Kataoka, +3 authors, Kaori Togashi.
Magn Reson Imaging, 2018 Mar 17; 50. PMID: 29545213
Diagnostic Usefulness of Combination of Diffusion-weighted Imaging and T2WI, Including Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Breast Lesions: Assessment of Histologic Grade.
Keum Won Kim, Cherie M Kuzmiak, +3 authors, Mu-Sik Lee.
Acad Radiol, 2018 Jan 18; 25(5). PMID: 29339079
Predicting survival and early clinical response to primary chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced breast cancer using DCE-MRI.
Roar Johansen, Line R Jensen, +6 authors, Ingrid S Gribbestad.
J Magn Reson Imaging, 2009 May 28; 29(6). PMID: 19472387
Added value of mean and entropy of apparent diffusion coefficient values for evaluating histologic phenotypes of invasive ductal breast cancer with MR imaging.
Shiteng Suo, Dandan Zhang, +4 authors, Jianrong Xu.
Eur Radiol, 2018 Aug 18; 29(3). PMID: 30116958
Diffusion-weighted imaging of mucinous carcinoma of the breast: evaluation of apparent diffusion coefficient and signal intensity in correlation with histologic findings.
Reiko Woodhams, Satoko Kakita, +4 authors, Hiroto Hatabu.
AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2009 Jun 23; 193(1). PMID: 19542422
Preoperative clinicopathologic factors and breast magnetic resonance imaging features can predict ductal carcinoma in situ with invasive components.
Chih-Wei Lee, Hwa-Koon Wu, +5 authors, Shou-Jen Kuo.
Eur J Radiol, 2016 Mar 15; 85(4). PMID: 26971424
Reproducibility of apparent diffusion coefficient measurements evaluated with different workstations.
M Fanariotis, K Vassiou, I Tsougos, I Fezoulidis.
Clin Radiol, 2017 Dec 23; 73(2). PMID: 29269037
Diagnostic and prognostic value of pretreatment SUV in 18F-FDG/PET in breast cancer: comparison with apparent diffusion coefficient from diffusion-weighted MR imaging.
Shingo Baba, Takuro Isoda, +4 authors, Hiroshi Honda.
J Nucl Med, 2014 Mar 26; 55(5). PMID: 24665089
Diagnostic Value of Diffusion-weighted Imaging and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values in the Differentiation of Breast Lesions, Histpathologic Subgroups and Correlatıon with Prognostıc Factors using 3.0 Tesla MR.
Yasin Akın, M Ümit Uğurlu, Handan Kaya, Erkin Arıbal.
J Breast Health, 2016 Jan 01; 12(3). PMID: 28331748    Free PMC article.
Characterization of ductal carcinoma in situ on diffusion weighted breast MRI.
Habib Rahbar, Savannah C Partridge, +4 authors, Constance D Lehman.
Eur Radiol, 2011 May 13; 21(9). PMID: 21562806
Apparent diffusion coefficient in differentiation between malignant and benign breast masses: does size matter?
C W S Wan, C Y Lee, +2 authors, K C H Lau.
Clin Radiol, 2015 Dec 22; 71(2). PMID: 26688549
Quantitative differentiation of breast lesions at 3T diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) using the ratio of distributed diffusion coefficient (DDC).
Gokhan Ertas, Can Onaygil, +2 authors, Erkin Aribal.
J Magn Reson Imaging, 2016 Jun 11; 44(6). PMID: 27284961
Diffusion-weighted imaging features of breast tumours and the surrounding stroma reflect intrinsic heterogeneous characteristics of molecular subtypes in breast cancer.
Ming Fan, Ting He, +4 authors, Lihua Li.
NMR Biomed, 2017 Dec 16; 31(2). PMID: 29244222
Correlation between apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and cellularity is different in several tumors: a meta-analysis.
Alexey Surov, Hans Jonas Meyer, Andreas Wienke.
Oncotarget, 2017 Sep 25; 8(35). PMID: 28938652    Free PMC article.
Highly Cited.
Triple-negative invasive breast cancer on dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR imaging: comparison with other breast cancer subtypes.
Ji Hyun Youk, Eun Ju Son, +2 authors, Eun-Kyung Kim.
Eur Radiol, 2012 Apr 25; 22(8). PMID: 22527371
Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of breast lesions: first experiences at 3 T.
Gladys G Lo, Victor Ai, +6 authors, Daisy Chien.
J Comput Assist Tomogr, 2009 Feb 04; 33(1). PMID: 19188787
A radiomic nomogram based on an apparent diffusion coefficient map for differential diagnosis of suspicious breast findings.
Bin Hu, Ke Xu, +3 authors, Lina Zhang.
Chin J Cancer Res, 2018 Sep 14; 30(4). PMID: 30210223    Free PMC article.
Correlation of the SUVmax of FDG-PET and ADC values of diffusion-weighted MR imaging with pathologic prognostic factors in breast carcinoma.
Kazuhiro Kitajima, Toshiko Yamano, +7 authors, Shozo Hirota.
Eur J Radiol, 2016 May 01; 85(5). PMID: 27130054
Associations between apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and KI 67 in different tumors: a meta-analysis. Part 1: ADCmean.
Alexey Surov, Hans Jonas Meyer, Andreas Wienke.
Oncotarget, 2017 Nov 02; 8(43). PMID: 29088879    Free PMC article.
Highly Cited.
Apparent diffusion coefficient values for discriminating benign and malignant breast MRI lesions: effects of lesion type and size.
Savannah C Partridge, Christiane D Mullins, +4 authors, Constance D Lehman.
AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2010 May 22; 194(6). PMID: 20489111
Diagnosis of breast masses from dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR: a machine learning approach.
Hongmin Cai, Yanxia Peng, +2 authors, Li Li.
PLoS One, 2014 Feb 06; 9(1). PMID: 24498092    Free PMC article.
Diagnostic performance of ADC for Non-mass-like breast lesions on MR imaging.
Tsugumi Imamura, Ichiro Isomoto, +7 authors, Masataka Uetani.
Magn Reson Med Sci, 2010 Dec 29; 9(4). PMID: 21187691
Feasibility and Diagnostic Performance of Voxelwise Computed Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Breast Cancer.
Jiejie Zhou, Endong Chen, +7 authors, Meihao Wang.
J Magn Reson Imaging, 2018 Oct 18; 49(6). PMID: 30328211    Free PMC article.
Whole-lesion histogram analysis of the apparent diffusion coefficient: Evaluation of the correlation with subtypes of mucinous breast carcinoma.
Yuan Guo, Qing-Cong Kong, +6 authors, Chun-Ling Liu.
J Magn Reson Imaging, 2017 Jun 24; 47(2). PMID: 28640538
Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer characterisation: correlations between the apparent diffusion coefficient and major prognostic factors.
Paolo Belli, Melania Costantini, +4 authors, Lorenzo Bonomo.
Radiol Med, 2014 Aug 07; 120(3). PMID: 25096888
Apparent diffusion coefficient mapping using diffusion-weighted MRI: impact of background parenchymal enhancement, amount of fibroglandular tissue and menopausal status on breast cancer diagnosis.
Joao V Horvat, Manuela Durando, +7 authors, Sunitha B Thakur.
Eur Radiol, 2018 Jan 14; 28(6). PMID: 29330631    Free PMC article.
Diffusion-weighted imaging of breast cancer: correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficient value with prognostic factors.
Sung Hun Kim, Eun Suk Cha, +5 authors, Young Jin Suh.
J Magn Reson Imaging, 2009 Aug 28; 30(3). PMID: 19711411
The role of parallel diffusion-weighted imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map values for evaluating breast lesions: preliminary results.
Guangwei Jin, Ningyu An, Michael A Jacobs, Kuncheng Li.
Acad Radiol, 2010 Mar 09; 17(4). PMID: 20207316    Free PMC article.
Diagnostic performance of apparent diffusion coefficient and quantitative kinetic parameters for predicting additional malignancy in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer.
Hyunkyung Yoo, Hee Jung Shin, +4 authors, Hak Hee Kim.
Magn Reson Imaging, 2014 Jun 09; 32(7). PMID: 24907855
Magnetic resonance imaging features in triple-negative breast cancer: comparison with luminal and HER2-overexpressing tumors.
Melania Costantini, Paolo Belli, +7 authors, Lorenzo Bonomo.
Clin Breast Cancer, 2012 Oct 09; 12(5). PMID: 23040001
Multiparametric breast MRI with 3T: Effectivity of combination of contrast enhanced MRI, DWI and 1H single voxel spectroscopy in differentiation of Breast tumors.
Erkin Aribal, Ruslan Asadov, +2 authors, Handan Kaya.
Eur J Radiol, 2016 May 01; 85(5). PMID: 27130059
Apparent Diffusion Coefficient for Distinguishing Between Malignant and Benign Lesions in the Head and Neck Region: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Alexey Surov, Hans Jonas Meyer, Andreas Wienke.
Front Oncol, 2020 Jan 24; 9. PMID: 31970081    Free PMC article.
Systematic Review.
Predictive Value of Early Post-Treatment Diffusion-Weighted MRI for Recurrence or Tumor Progression of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treated with Chemo-Radiotherapy.
Esteban Brenet, Coralie Barbe, +5 authors, Marc Labrousse.
Cancers (Basel), 2020 May 20; 12(5). PMID: 32422975    Free PMC article.
Pretreatment apparent diffusion coefficient does not predict therapy response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.
Alexey Surov, Andreas Wienke, Hans Jonas Meyer.
Breast, 2020 Jul 12; 53. PMID: 32652460    Free PMC article.
Mean Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Is a Sufficient Conventional Diffusion-weighted MRI Metric to Improve Breast MRI Diagnostic Performance: Results from the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group A6702 Diffusion Imaging Trial.
Elizabeth S McDonald, Justin Romanoff, +20 authors, Savannah C Partridge.
Radiology, 2020 Nov 18; 298(1). PMID: 33201788    Free PMC article.
Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Reflects Tumor Grading and Microvascular Invasion in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Alexey Surov, Maciej Pech, +6 authors, Andreas Wienke.
Liver Cancer, 2021 Mar 13; 10(1). PMID: 33708636    Free PMC article.
Review.
An analysis of Ki-67 expression in stage 1 invasive ductal breast carcinoma using apparent diffusion coefficient histograms.
Maolin Xu, Qi Tang, +2 authors, Fang Li.
Quant Imaging Med Surg, 2021 Apr 06; 11(4). PMID: 33816188    Free PMC article.
Multidimensional Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Characterization of Tissue Microstructure in Breast Cancer Patients: A Prospective Pilot Study.
Isaac Daimiel Naranjo, Alexis Reymbaut, +7 authors, Katja Pinker-Domenig.
Cancers (Basel), 2021 Apr 04; 13(7). PMID: 33807205    Free PMC article.