Journal Article
. 2020 Feb; 40(1):36-41.
doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2020.36.

Whole slide imaging compared with light microscopy for primary diagnosis in surgical neuropathology: a validation study

Ali Alassiri 1 Amna Almutrafi 1 Fahd Alsufiani 1 Atheer Al Nehkilan 2 Alaa Al Salim 1 Hesham Musleh 1 Mohammad Aziz 1 Walid Khalbuss 1 
Affiliations
  • PMID: 32026707
  •     26 References
  •     4 citations

Abstract

Background: Digital pathology practice is rapidly gaining popularity among practicing anatomic pathologists. Acceptance is higher among the newer generation of pathologists who are willing to adapt to this new diagnostic method due to the advantages offered by whole slide imaging (WSI) compared to traditional light microscopy (TLM). We performed this validation study because we plan to implement the WSI system for diagnostic services.

Objectives: Determine the feasibility of using digital pathology for diagnostic services by assessing the equivalency of WSI and TLM.

Design: A laboratory-based cross-sectional study.

Setting: Central laboratory at a tertiary health care center.

Materials And Methods: Four practicing surgical pathologists participated in this study. Each pathologist blindly reviewed 60 surgical neuropathology cases with a minimum 8-week washout-period between the two diagnostic modalities (WSI vs. TLM). Intraobserver concordance rates between WSI and TLM diagnoses as compared to the original diagnosis were calculated.

Main Outcome Measures: Overall intraobserver concordance rates between each diagnostic method (WSI and TLM) and original diagnosis.

Sample Size: 60 in-house surgical neuropathology cases.

Results: The overall intraobserver concordance rate between TLM and original diagnosis was 86.3% (range 76.7%-91.7%) versus 80.8% for WSI (range 68.3%-88.3%). These findings are suggestive of the superiority of TLM, but the Fleiss' Kappa statistic indicated that the two methods are equivalent, despite the low level of the K value.

Conclusion: WSI is not inferior to the light microscopy and is feasible for primary diagnosis in surgical neuropathology. However, to ensure the best results, only formally trained neuropathologists should handle the digital neuropathology service.

Limitations: Only one diagnostic slide per case rather than the whole set of slides, sample size was relatively small, and there was an insufficient number of participating neuropathologists.

Conflict Of Interest: None.

Validation of a whole slide imaging system for primary diagnosis in surgical pathology: A community hospital experience.
Thomas P Buck, Rebecca Dilorio, Lauren Havrilla, Dennis G O'Neill.
J Pathol Inform, 2014 Dec 24; 5(1). PMID: 25535591    Free PMC article.
US Food and Drug Administration Approval of Whole Slide Imaging for Primary Diagnosis: A Key Milestone Is Reached and New Questions Are Raised.
Andrew J Evans, Thomas W Bauer, +12 authors, Liron Pantanowitz.
Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2018 May 01; 142(11). PMID: 29708429
Implementation of large-scale routine diagnostics using whole slide imaging in Sweden: Digital pathology experiences 2006-2013.
Sten Thorstenson, Jesper Molin, Claes Lundström.
J Pathol Inform, 2014 May 21; 5(1). PMID: 24843825    Free PMC article.
Validation of multiple whole slide imaging scanners based on the guideline from the College of American Pathologists Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center.
Michael J Thrall, Jana L Wimmer, Mary R Schwartz.
Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2015 May 01; 139(5). PMID: 25927149
Concordance between digital pathology and light microscopy in general surgical pathology: a pilot study of 100 cases.
Joseph P Houghton, Aaron J Ervine, +5 authors, Peter W Hamilton.
J Clin Pathol, 2014 Sep 25; 67(12). PMID: 25248822
Validation of Whole-Slide Imaging for Histolopathogical Diagnosis: Current State.
Adela Saco, Jose Ramírez, +2 authors, Jaume Ordi.
Pathobiology, 2016 Apr 23; 83(2-3). PMID: 27099935
Review.
Whole slide imaging diagnostic concordance with light microscopy for breast needle biopsies.
W Scott Campbell, Steven H Hinrichs, +5 authors, William W West.
Hum Pathol, 2014 Jun 11; 45(8). PMID: 24913758
Implementation of Whole Slide Imaging for Clinical Purposes: Issues to Consider From the Perspective of Early Adopters.
Andrew J Evans, Mohamed E Salama, Walter H Henricks, Liron Pantanowitz.
Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2017 Apr 26; 141(7). PMID: 28440660
Review.
Validating whole slide imaging for diagnostic purposes in pathology: guideline from the College of American Pathologists Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center.
Liron Pantanowitz, John H Sinard, +8 authors, College of American Pathologists Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center.
Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2013 May 03; 137(12). PMID: 23634907    Free PMC article.
Highly Cited. Review.
Cytologic evaluation of image-guided fine needle aspiration biopsies via robotic microscopy: A validation study.
Guoping Cai, Lisa A Teot, +4 authors, Anil V Parwani.
J Pathol Inform, 2010 Sep 02; 1. PMID: 20805959    Free PMC article.
Diagnostic digital cytopathology: Are we ready yet?
Jarret C House, Evita B Henderson-Jackson, +10 authors, Marilyn M Bui.
J Pathol Inform, 2014 Jan 07; 4. PMID: 24392242    Free PMC article.
Digital slide images for primary diagnostics in breast pathology: a feasibility study.
S Al-Janabi, A Huisman, S M Willems, P J Van Diest.
Hum Pathol, 2012 Aug 21; 43(12). PMID: 22901465
Diagnostic Efficiency in Digital Pathology: A Comparison of Optical Versus Digital Assessment in 510 Surgical Pathology Cases.
Anne M Mills, Sarah E Gradecki, +5 authors, Helen P Cathro.
Am J Surg Pathol, 2017 Sep 07; 42(1). PMID: 28877052
Canadian licensure for the use of digital pathology for routine diagnoses: one more step toward a new era of pathology practice without borders.
Bernard Têtu, Andrew Evans.
Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2013 Jun 28; 138(3). PMID: 23802851
Validation of digital pathology imaging for primary histopathological diagnosis.
David R J Snead, Yee-Wah Tsang, +16 authors, Ian A Cree.
Histopathology, 2015 Sep 27; 68(7). PMID: 26409165
Validation of diagnostic accuracy with whole-slide imaging compared with glass slide review in dermatopathology.
Kabeer K Shah, Julia S Lehman, +3 authors, Carilyn N Wieland.
J Am Acad Dermatol, 2016 Oct 16; 75(6). PMID: 27742174
Whole Slide Imaging Versus Microscopy for Primary Diagnosis in Surgical Pathology: A Multicenter Blinded Randomized Noninferiority Study of 1992 Cases (Pivotal Study).
Sanjay Mukhopadhyay, Michael D Feldman, +31 authors, Clive R Taylor.
Am J Surg Pathol, 2017 Sep 30; 42(1). PMID: 28961557    Free PMC article.
The College of American Pathologists guidelines for whole slide imaging validation are feasible for pediatric pathology: a pediatric pathology practice experience.
Michael A Arnold, Emily Chenever, +9 authors, Thomas Barr.
Pediatr Dev Pathol, 2014 Nov 12; 18(2). PMID: 25387255
Ovarian frozen section diagnosis: use of whole-slide imaging shows excellent correlation between virtual slide and original interpretations in a large series of cases.
Margaret A Fallon, David C Wilbur, Manju Prasad.
Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2010 Jul 01; 134(7). PMID: 20586631
Validation of whole slide imaging for primary diagnosis in surgical pathology.
Thomas W Bauer, Lynn Schoenfield, +3 authors, Walter H Henricks.
Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2013 Jan 18; 137(4). PMID: 23323732
Pitfalls in the use of whole slide imaging for the diagnosis of central nervous system tumors: A pilot study in surgical neuropathology.
Melike Pekmezci, Sanem Pinar Uysal, +2 authors, Han Sung Lee.
J Pathol Inform, 2016 May 25; 7. PMID: 27217975    Free PMC article.
Utility of whole slide imaging and virtual microscopy in prostate pathology.
Philippe Camparo, Lars Egevad, +12 authors, Murali Varma.
APMIS, 2012 Mar 21; 120(4). PMID: 22429212
Review.
Whole slide images for primary diagnostics of gastrointestinal tract pathology: a feasibility study.
Shaimaa Al-Janabi, André Huisman, +4 authors, Paul J van Diest.
Hum Pathol, 2011 Sep 23; 43(5). PMID: 21937077
Validation of whole slide imaging in the primary diagnosis of gynaecological pathology in a University Hospital.
Jaume Ordi, Paola Castillo, +4 authors, Jose Ramírez.
J Clin Pathol, 2014 Oct 31; 68(1). PMID: 25355520
The evaluation of colon biopsies using virtual microscopy is reliable.
Rachel S van der Post, Jeroen A W M van der Laak, +4 authors, Marius Nap.
Histopathology, 2013 May 23; 63(1). PMID: 23692065
Going fully digital: Perspective of a Dutch academic pathology lab.
Nikolas Stathonikos, Mitko Veta, André Huisman, Paul J van Diest.
J Pathol Inform, 2013 Jul 17; 4. PMID: 23858390    Free PMC article.
The histopathological diagnosis of atypical meningioma: glass slide versus whole slide imaging for grading assessment.
Serena Ammendola, Elena Bariani, +7 authors, Valeria Barresi.
Virchows Arch, 2020 Dec 12; 478(4). PMID: 33305338    Free PMC article.
Integrated digital pathology at scale: A solution for clinical diagnostics and cancer research at a large academic medical center.
Peter J Schüffler, Luke Geneslaw, +29 authors, Thomas J Fuchs.
J Am Med Inform Assoc, 2021 Jul 15; 28(9). PMID: 34260720    Free PMC article.
Loss of fidelity in scanned digital images compared to glass slides of brain tumors resected using cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator.
Cathryn R Cadwell, Sarah Bowman, Zoltan G Laszik, Melike Pekmezci.
Brain Pathol, 2021 Feb 13; 31(4). PMID: 33576118    Free PMC article.
Integrating digital pathology into clinical practice running title: clinical implementation of digital pathology.
Matthew G Hanna, Orly Ardon, +3 authors, Meera R Hameed.
Mod Pathol, 2021 Oct 03;. PMID: 34599281
Review.