Review
. 1998 Jan; 183(3):253-63.
doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(199711)183:3<253::AID-PATH927>3.0.CO;2-P.

The use of digital images in pathology

P N Furness 1 
Affiliations
  • PMID: 9422979
  •     14 citations

Abstract

Digital images are routinely used by the publishing industry, but most diagnostic pathologists are unfamiliar with the technology and its possibilities. This review aims to explain the basic principles of digital image acquisition, storage, manipulation and use, and the possibilities provided not only in research, but also in teaching and in routine diagnostic pathology. Images of natural objects are usually expressed digitally as 'bitmaps'--rectilinear arrays of small dots. The size of each dot can vary, but so can its information content in terms, for example, of colour, greyscale or opacity. Various file formats and compression algorithms are available. Video cameras connected to microscopes are familiar to most pathologists; video images can be converted directly to a digital form by a suitably equipped computer. Digital cameras and scanners are alternative acquisition tools of relevance to pathologists. Once acquired, a digital image can easily be subjected to the digital equivalent of any conventional darkroom manipulation and modern software allows much more flexibility, to such an extent that a new tool for scientific fraud has been created. For research, image enhancement and analysis is an increasingly powerful and affordable tool. Morphometric measurements are, after many predictions, at last beginning to be part of the toolkit of the diagnostic pathologist. In teaching, the potential to create dramatic yet informative presentations is demonstrated daily by the publishing industry; such methods are readily applicable to the classroom. The combination of digital images and the Internet raises many possibilities; for example, instead of seeking one expert diagnostic opinion, one could simultaneously seek the opinion of many, all around the globe. It is inevitable that in the coming years the use of digital images will spread from the laboratory to the medical curriculum and to the whole of diagnostic pathology.

A surgical pathology system for gross specimen examination.
D Cruz, M Seixas.
Proc AMIA Symp, 1999 Nov 24;. PMID: 10566356    Free PMC article.
Transcontinental communication and quantitative digital histopathology via the Internet; with special reference to prostate neoplasia.
R Montironi, D Thompson, +7 authors, P H Bartels.
J Clin Pathol, 2002 May 31; 55(6). PMID: 12037030    Free PMC article.
Combined histomorphometric and gene-expression profiling applied to toxicology.
Andres Kriete, Mary K Anderson, +6 authors, J Mark Braughler.
Genome Biol, 2003 May 08; 4(5). PMID: 12734012    Free PMC article.
Digital photography: a primer for pathologists.
Roger S Riley, Jonathan M Ben-Ezra, +2 authors, Gina Romagnoli.
J Clin Lab Anal, 2004 Apr 06; 18(2). PMID: 15065212    Free PMC article.
Review.
The use of digital imaging, video conferencing, and telepathology in histopathology: a national survey.
T Dennis, R D Start, S S Cross.
J Clin Pathol, 2005 Mar 01; 58(3). PMID: 15735155    Free PMC article.
[Digital slide training portal. Training slides available on the Internet from the German division of the IAP].
K Saeger, D Schmidt.
Pathologe, 2006 Oct 06; 27(6). PMID: 17021916
Semiquantitative and semi-automated morphometric evaluation of chronic lesions in renal biopsies.
Daniel Abensur Athanazio, Gloria Maria Maranhão Sweet, Carlos Alberto Silva, Washington Luis Conrado dos-Santos.
Int Urol Nephrol, 2008 Nov 08; 41(3). PMID: 18989745
Virtual slide telepathology workstation of the future: lessons learned from teleradiology.
Elizabeth A Krupinski.
Hum Pathol, 2009 Jun 26; 40(8). PMID: 19552939    Free PMC article.
Histopathologic features aid in predicting risk for progression of IgA nephropathy.
Michael Walsh, Aylin Sar, +4 authors, Brenda Hemmelgarn.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 2010 Jan 22; 5(3). PMID: 20089495    Free PMC article.
Avoiding twisted pixels: ethical guidelines for the appropriate use and manipulation of scientific digital images.
Douglas W Cromey.
Sci Eng Ethics, 2010 Jun 23; 16(4). PMID: 20567932    Free PMC article.
HIV target cells in Schistosoma haematobium-infected female genital mucosa.
Peter Mark Jourdan, Sigve Dhondup Holmen, +2 authors, Eyrun Floerecke Kjetland.
Am J Trop Med Hyg, 2011 Dec 07; 85(6). PMID: 22144444    Free PMC article.
Observer performance in the use of digital and optical microscopy for the interpretation of tissue-based biomarkers.
Marios A Gavrielides, Catherine Conway, +2 authors, Stephen M Hewitt.
Anal Cell Pathol (Amst), 2014 Jan 01; 2014. PMID: 25763314    Free PMC article.
Comparison between digital and optical microscopy: Analysis in a mouse gut inflammation model.
Airton Pereira E Silva, Sylvia Maria Nicolau Campos, Isabelle Mazza Guimarães, Gerlinde Agate Platais Brasil Teixeira.
Biomed Rep, 2017 Sep 13; 7(3). PMID: 28894572    Free PMC article.
Observer variability in the interpretation of HER2/neu immunohistochemical expression with unaided and computer-aided digital microscopy.
Marios A Gavrielides, Brandon D Gallas, +2 authors, Stephen M Hewitt.
Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2011 Feb 03; 135(2). PMID: 21284444    Free PMC article.